Gruenenfelder Thomas M
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 26;10:944. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00944. eCollection 2019.
This paper describes a new hypothesis, referred to as the multiple definitions model, concerning the mental representation of fuzzy concepts. The basic claim of the model is that such concepts are represented as a set of multiple definitions, where each definition is exact. Fuzziness results from the fact that using such concepts requires sampling multiple such exact definitions of the concept. The model was applied to concepts that can be defined as a range of values over a single dimension (such as middle-age), and tested using conjunctions and disjunctions of middle-age (e.g., "A person is middle-aged at both 50 and 63."). The model predicts that, controlling for the truths of individual ages, the truths of conjunctions involving ages that are close together will be judged higher than the truths of conjunctions involving ages farther apart, and that the opposite effect will occur for disjunctions (the distance effect). The results of two experiments confirmed this prediction. However, both experiments also found that conjunctions were judged truer than the less true of their component ages, and that disjunctions were judged less true than the truer of their component ages. The model does not predict this "minimax" effect. One possible explanation of the minimax effect was tested; another modeled. The overall conclusion is that the multiple definitions model is a viable contender to explain the distance effect. The minimax effect, however, is still in need of a satisfactory explanation.
本文描述了一种关于模糊概念心理表征的新假设,即多重定义模型。该模型的基本主张是,此类概念被表征为一组多重定义,其中每个定义都是精确的。模糊性源于这样一个事实:使用此类概念需要对该概念的多个精确定义进行抽样。该模型被应用于可定义为单一维度上一系列值的概念(如中年),并使用中年的合取和析取进行测试(例如,“一个人在50岁和63岁时都是中年。”)。该模型预测,在控制个体年龄的真实性的情况下,涉及相近年龄的合取的真实性将比涉及相距较远年龄的合取的真实性被判断得更高,而对于析取则会出现相反的效果(距离效应)。两个实验的结果证实了这一预测。然而,两个实验还发现,合取被判断为比其组成年龄中较不真实的那个更真实,析取被判断为比其组成年龄中较真实的那个更不真实。该模型并未预测到这种“最小-最大”效应。对“最小-最大”效应的一种可能解释进行了测试;另一种进行了建模。总体结论是,多重定义模型是解释距离效应的一个可行竞争者。然而,“最小-最大”效应仍需要一个令人满意的解释。