Hsieh Scott S, Chesler David A, Fleischmann Dominik, Pelc Norbert J
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305.
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charleston, Massachusetts 02114.
Med Phys. 2016 Mar;43(3):1361-8. doi: 10.1118/1.4941954.
To find an upper bound on the maximum dose reduction possible for any reconstruction algorithm, analytic or iterative, that result from the inclusion of the data statistics. The authors do not analyze noise reduction possible from prior knowledge or assumptions about the object.
The authors examined the task of estimating the density of a circular lesion in a cross section. Raw data were simulated by forward projection of existing images and numerical phantoms. To assess an upper bound on the achievable dose reduction by any algorithm, the authors assume that both the background and the shape of the lesion are completely known. Under these conditions, the best possible estimate of the density can be determined by solving a weighted least squares problem directly in the raw data domain. Any possible reconstruction algorithm that does not use prior knowledge or make assumptions about the object, including filtered backprojection (FBP) or iterative reconstruction methods with this constraint, must be no better than this least squares solution. The authors simulated 10,000 sets of noisy data and compared the variance in density from the least squares solution with those from FBP. Density was estimated from FBP images using either averaging within a ROI, or streak-adaptive averaging with better noise performance.
The bound on the possible dose reduction depends on the degree to which the observer can read through the possibly streaky noise. For the described low contrast detection task with the signal shape and background known exactly, the average dose reduction possible compared to FBP with streak-adaptive averaging was 42% and it was 64% if only the ROI average is used with FBP. The exact amount of dose reduction also depends on the background anatomy, with statistically inhomogeneous backgrounds showing greater benefits.
The dose reductions from new, statistical reconstruction methods can be bounded. Larger dose reductions in the density estimation task studied here are only possible with the introduction of prior knowledge, which can introduce bias.
找出因纳入数据统计信息而使任何解析或迭代重建算法可能实现的最大剂量降低的上限。作者未分析基于对物体的先验知识或假设可能实现的降噪情况。
作者研究了估计横截面中圆形病变密度的任务。原始数据通过对现有图像和数值体模的前向投影进行模拟。为评估任何算法可实现的剂量降低上限,作者假设病变的背景和形状完全已知。在这些条件下,可通过直接在原始数据域中求解加权最小二乘问题来确定密度的最佳估计值。任何不使用先验知识或不对物体做假设的可能重建算法,包括滤波反投影(FBP)或受此约束的迭代重建方法,必定不会优于此最小二乘解。作者模拟了10000组噪声数据,并将最小二乘解的密度方差与FBP的密度方差进行比较。使用感兴趣区域(ROI)内的平均法或具有更好噪声性能的条纹自适应平均法从FBP图像估计密度。
可能的剂量降低上限取决于观察者透过可能存在条纹的噪声进行读取的程度。对于信号形状和背景已知的所述低对比度检测任务,与采用条纹自适应平均法的FBP相比,可能的平均剂量降低为42%,如果FBP仅使用ROI平均法,则为64%。剂量降低的确切量还取决于背景解剖结构,统计上不均匀的背景显示出更大的益处。
新的统计重建方法的剂量降低可以有上限。在此研究的密度估计任务中,只有引入先验知识才可能实现更大的剂量降低,但这可能会引入偏差。