Miller Christi W, Bates Emily, Brennan Marc
a Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences , University of Washington , Seattle , USA and.
b Boys Town National Research Hospital , Omaha , USA.
Int J Audiol. 2016;55(5):305-12. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1137364. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
Frequency lowering (FL) strategies move high frequency sound into a lower frequency range. This study determined if speech perception differences are observed between some of the different frequency lowering strategies that are available.
A cross-sectional, repeated-measures design was used to compare three hearing aids that used wide-dynamic range compression (WDRC) and either non-linear frequency compression (NFC), linear frequency transposition (LFT), or frequency translation (FT). The hearing aids were matched to prescriptive real ear targets for WDRC. The settings for each FL strategy were adjusted to provide audibility for a 6300 Hz filtered speech signal. Sentence recognition in noise, subjective measures of sound quality, and a modified version of the speech intelligibility index (SII) were measured.
Ten adults between the ages of 63 to 82 years with bilateral, high frequency hearing loss.
LFT and FT led to poorer sentence recognition compared to WDRC for most individuals. No difference in sentence recognition occurred with and without NFC. The quality questionnaire and SII showed few differences between conditions.
Under similar fitting and testing conditions of this study, FL techniques may not provide speech understanding benefit in certain background noise situations.
频率降低(FL)策略将高频声音移至较低频率范围。本研究确定在一些可用的不同频率降低策略之间是否观察到言语感知差异。
采用横断面重复测量设计,比较三种使用宽动态范围压缩(WDRC)以及非线性频率压缩(NFC)、线性频率转换(LFT)或频率平移(FT)的助听器。这些助听器与WDRC的规定真耳目标相匹配。调整每种FL策略的设置,以便为6300Hz滤波言语信号提供可听度。测量了噪声中的句子识别、声音质量主观测量以及言语可懂度指数(SII)的修正版本。
10名年龄在63至82岁之间的双侧高频听力损失成年人。
对于大多数个体,与WDRC相比,LFT和FT导致较差的句子识别。有无NFC时句子识别无差异。质量问卷和SII在各条件之间显示出很少差异。
在本研究的相似配适和测试条件下,FL技术在某些背景噪声情况下可能无法提供言语理解益处。