Bijeljac-Babic Ranka, Höhle Barbara, Nazzi Thierry
Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes - CNRSParis, France; Université de PoitiersPoitiers, France.
Universität Potsdam Potsdam, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 23;7:210. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00210. eCollection 2016.
Infants start learning the prosodic properties of their native language before 12 months, as shown by the emergence of a trochaic bias in English-learning infants between 6 and 9 months (Jusczyk et al., 1993), and in German-learning infants between 4 and 6 months (Höhle et al., 2009, 2014), while French-learning infants do not show a bias at 6 months (Höhle et al., 2009). This language-specific emergence of a trochaic bias is supported by the fact that English and German are languages with trochaic predominance in their lexicons, while French is a language with phrase-final lengthening but lacking lexical stress. We explored the emergence of a trochaic bias in bilingual French/German infants, to study whether the developmental trajectory would be similar to monolingual infants and whether amount of relative exposure to the two languages has an impact on the emergence of the bias. Accordingly, we replicated Höhle et al. (2009) with 24 bilingual 6-month-olds learning French and German simultaneously. All infants had been exposed to both languages for 30 to 70% of the time from birth. Using the Head Preference Procedure, infants were presented with two lists of stimuli, one made up of several occurrences of the pseudoword /GAba/ with word-initial stress (trochaic pattern), the second one made up of several occurrences of the pseudoword /gaBA/ with word-final stress (iambic pattern). The stimuli were recorded by a native German female speaker. Results revealed that these French/German bilingual 6-month-olds have a trochaic bias (as evidenced by a preference to listen to the trochaic pattern). Hence, their listening preference is comparable to that of monolingual German-learning 6-month-olds, but differs from that of monolingual French-learning 6-month-olds who did not show any preference (Höhle et al., 2009). Moreover, the size of the trochaic bias in the bilingual infants was not correlated with their amount of exposure to German. The present results thus establish that the development of a trochaic bias in simultaneous bilinguals is not delayed compared to monolingual German-learning infants (Höhle et al., 2009) and is rather independent of the amount of exposure to German relative to French.
婴儿在12个月之前就开始学习母语的韵律特性,这一点已得到证实。例如,学习英语的婴儿在6至9个月时会出现扬抑抑格偏好(Jusczyk等人,1993),学习德语的婴儿在4至6个月时会出现这种偏好(Höhle等人,2009年、2014年),而学习法语的婴儿在6个月时则没有表现出偏好(Höhle等人,2009)。英语和德语在词汇中以扬抑抑格为主,而法语是一种词尾延长但缺乏词汇重音的语言,这一事实支持了这种特定语言的扬抑抑格偏好的出现。我们探究了法语/德语双语婴儿中扬抑抑格偏好的出现情况,以研究其发展轨迹是否与单语婴儿相似,以及两种语言的相对接触量是否会对这种偏好的出现产生影响。因此,我们对24名同时学习法语和德语的6个月大的双语婴儿重复了Höhle等人(2009)的研究。所有婴儿从出生起接触两种语言的时间占总时间的30%至70%。使用头部偏好程序,向婴儿呈现两组刺激,一组由几次出现的带有词首重音的假词/GAba/组成(扬抑抑格模式),另一组由几次出现的带有词尾重音的假词/gaBA/组成(抑扬格模式)。刺激由一位以德语为母语的女性录制。结果显示,这些法语/德语双语6个月大的婴儿有扬抑抑格偏好(表现为更喜欢听扬抑抑格模式)。因此,他们的听力偏好与单语学习德语的6个月大婴儿相当,但与没有表现出任何偏好的单语学习法语的6个月大婴儿不同(Höhle等人,2009)。此外,双语婴儿中扬抑抑格偏好的程度与他们接触德语的量无关。因此,目前的结果表明,与单语学习德语的婴儿相比(Höhle等人,2009),同时学习两种语言的婴儿中扬抑抑格偏好的发展并没有延迟,而且相当独立于相对于法语而言接触德语的量。