• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知需求在不同年龄段是否具有相同的含义?

Does Need for Cognition Have the Same Meaning at Different Ages?

机构信息

1 University of Nice, Nice, France.

2 University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2017 Dec;24(8):987-998. doi: 10.1177/1073191116636449. Epub 2016 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1177/1073191116636449
PMID:26944684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5600711/
Abstract

Determining whether Need for Cognition (NC) has the same meaning across age may help understand why there are dramatically different age trends for cognitive abilities and for NC in adulthood. Data from 5,004 participants aged between 18 and 99 years were used to examine both internal relations and external relations of NC. Internal relations were investigated with measures of reliability, examination of factor invariance, and test-retest coefficients across three age groups. External relations were investigated by examining relations of NC with cognitive abilities, engagement, personality, self-rated cognition, and affect. Results suggest that NC may be a broad construct that could reflect motivation to seek out intellectual challenge. In addition, examination of both internal and external relations of NC indicated that the meaning of the construct may be the same across the life span. Finally, the current article showed that the strongest predictor of NC was Openness to Experience, at any age.

摘要

确定认知需求(NC)是否在不同年龄段具有相同的含义,可能有助于理解为什么认知能力和成年人的 NC 呈现出截然不同的年龄趋势。本研究使用了来自 18 至 99 岁的 5004 名参与者的数据,以检验 NC 的内部关系和外部关系。内部关系通过可靠性度量、因子不变性检验和三个年龄组的测试-重测系数来研究。外部关系通过考察 NC 与认知能力、参与度、人格、自我认知和情感的关系来研究。结果表明,NC 可能是一个广泛的结构,可以反映寻求智力挑战的动机。此外,对 NC 的内部和外部关系的考察表明,该结构的含义在整个生命周期中可能是相同的。最后,本文表明,无论年龄大小,NC 的最强预测因子是开放性。

相似文献

1
Does Need for Cognition Have the Same Meaning at Different Ages?认知需求在不同年龄段是否具有相同的含义?
Assessment. 2017 Dec;24(8):987-998. doi: 10.1177/1073191116636449. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
2
Personality-cognition relations across adulthood.人格-认知关系贯穿成年期。
Dev Psychol. 2011 Mar;47(2):303-10. doi: 10.1037/a0021816.
3
Does the meaning of neurocognitive change change with age?神经认知变化的意义是否随年龄而变化?
Neuropsychology. 2010 Mar;24(2):273-8. doi: 10.1037/a0017284.
4
Personality-cognition associations across the adult life span and potential moderators: Results from two cohorts.人格-认知关联在成年期的变化及潜在的调节因素:来自两个队列的研究结果。
J Pers. 2020 Oct;88(5):1025-1039. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12548. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
5
Investigating the relationship between decision-making processes and cognitive processes, personality traits, and affect via the structural equation model in young adults.采用结构方程模型探究青年人群决策过程与认知过程、人格特质和情绪的关系。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2020 Nov-Dec;27(6):558-569. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1576690. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
6
The association of educational attainment, cognitive level of job, and leisure activities during the course of adulthood with cognitive performance in old age: the role of openness to experience.成年期的教育程度、工作认知水平和休闲活动与老年认知表现的关联:经验开放性的作用。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 May;28(5):733-40. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001933. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
7
Which Aspects of Social Support Are Associated With Which Cognitive Abilities for Which People?社会支持的哪些方面与哪些人的哪些认知能力相关?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 Oct 1;72(6):1006-1016. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv119.
8
Personality, self-rated health, and subjective age in a life-span sample: the moderating role of chronological age.人格、自评健康和主观年龄在全生命周期样本中的研究:年龄的调节作用。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Dec;27(4):875-80. doi: 10.1037/a0028301. Epub 2012 May 14.
9
When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span.认知功能何时达到顶峰?不同认知能力在整个生命周期中的异步起伏。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Apr;26(4):433-43. doi: 10.1177/0956797614567339. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
10
The interplay between personality and cognitive ability across 12 years in middle and late adulthood: Evidence for reciprocal associations.成年中后期12年间人格与认知能力的相互作用:相互关联的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2017 May;32(3):259-277. doi: 10.1037/pag0000166. Epub 2017 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
A voxel-based morphometry study on gray matter correlates of need for cognition and exploratory information seeking.基于体素的形态测量学研究对认知需求和探索性信息寻求的灰质相关性。
Brain Behav. 2023 Sep;13(9):e3138. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3138. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
2
The relation between Self-Control, Need for Cognition and Action Orientation in secondary school students: A conceptual replication study.中学生自我控制、认知需求与行动倾向的关系:一项概念复制研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 9;18(6):e0286714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286714. eCollection 2023.
3
A measure of individual differences in readers' approaches to text and its relation to reading experience and reading comprehension.一种衡量读者处理文本方式的个体差异及其与阅读体验和阅读理解关系的方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):899-931. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01852-1. Epub 2022 May 3.
4
An instrument to assess HIV-related knowledge and adjustment to HIV+ status, and their association with anti-retroviral adherence.一种评估与 HIV 相关的知识和对 HIV+状态的调整的工具,以及它们与抗逆转录病毒依从性的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 22;15(6):e0227722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227722. eCollection 2020.
5
Applying Item Response Theory to Develop a Shortened Version of the Need for Cognition Scale.应用项目反应理论开发认知需求量表的简版。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2018 Sep 30;14(3):75-86. doi: 10.5709/acp-0240-z. eCollection 2018.
6
Preference for Deliberation and Perceived Usefulness of Standard- and Narrative-Style Leaflet Designs: Implications for Equitable Cancer-Screening Communication.对标准式和叙述式传单设计的审议偏好及感知有用性:对公平癌症筛查沟通的启示
Ann Behav Med. 2020 Feb 21;54(3):193-201. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz039.
7
The Very Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition: Developing a Six-Item Version.认知需求的高效评估:开发一个六项版本。
Assessment. 2020 Dec;27(8):1870-1885. doi: 10.1177/1073191118793208. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Localizing age-related individual differences in a hierarchical structure.在层次结构中定位与年龄相关的个体差异。
Intelligence. 2004 Nov;32(6). doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2004.07.003.
2
Correlates of cognitive change.认知变化的相关因素。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1026-1048. doi: 10.1037/a0034847. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
3
Investment and intellect: a review and meta-analysis.投资与智力:综述与元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;139(4):841-69. doi: 10.1037/a0030746. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
4
Investment trait, activity engagement, and age: independent effects on cognitive ability.投资特质、活动参与度与年龄:对认知能力的独立影响。
J Aging Res. 2012;2012:949837. doi: 10.1155/2012/949837. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
5
Influence of social desirability on age differences in self-reports of mood and personality.社会期望对情绪和个性自评的年龄差异的影响。
J Pers. 2011 Aug;79(4):741-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00700.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
6
The role of activity engagement in the relations between Openness/Intellect and cognition.活动参与在开放性/智力与认知关系中的作用。
Pers Individ Dif. 2010 Dec 1;49(8):896-901. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.026.
7
Same or different? Clarifying the relationship of need for cognition to personality and intelligence.相同还是不同?厘清认知需求与人格和智力的关系。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Jan;36(1):82-96. doi: 10.1177/0146167209351886. Epub 2009 Nov 9.
8
When does age-related cognitive decline begin?与年龄相关的认知衰退何时开始?
Neurobiol Aging. 2009 Apr;30(4):507-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.09.023. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
9
Contextual analysis of fluid intelligence.流体智力的情境分析
Intelligence. 2008;36(5):464-486. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2007.10.003.
10
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.一种独立于精神病理学的新的社会期望量表。
J Consult Psychol. 1960 Aug;24:349-54. doi: 10.1037/h0047358.