INSERM U-987, Boulogne-Billancourt, France; CHU Ambroise Paré, APHP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin, Versailles, France.
Pain Center, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Instituto do Câncer, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lancet Neurol. 2016 May;15(6):555-65. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00017-X. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
Data from previous studies suggest that botulinum toxin A has analgesic effects against peripheral neuropathic pain, but the quality of the evidence is low. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of repeated administrations of botulinum toxin A in patients with neuropathic pain.
We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at two outpatient clinics in France (Clinical Pain Centre, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, Boulogne-Billancourt, and Neurological Centre, Hôpital Dupuytren, Limoges) and one in Brazil (Neurological Department, Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP, São Paulo). Patients aged 18-85 years with peripheral neuropathic pain were randomly assigned (1:1) by block randomisation, according to a centralised schedule, to receive two subcutaneous administrations of botulinum toxin A (up to 300 units) or placebo, 12 weeks apart. All patients and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the efficacy of botulinum toxin A versus placebo, measured as the change from baseline in self-reported mean weekly pain intensity over the course of 24 weeks from the first administration. The primary efficacy analysis was a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01251211.
Between Oct 2, 2010, and Aug 2, 2013, 152 patients were enrolled, of whom 68 were randomly assigned (34 per group), and 66 (37 [56%] men) were included in the primary analysis (34 in the botulinum toxin A group and 32 in the placebo group). Botulinum toxin A reduced pain intensity over 24 weeks compared with placebo (adjusted effect estimate -0·77, 95% CI -0·95 to -0·59; p<0·0001). Pain on injection was the only adverse effect reported, and occurred in 19 (56%) participants in the botulinum toxin A group and 17 (53%) of those in the placebo group (p=1·0). Severe pain was experienced by ten (29%) participants in the botulinum toxin A group and 11 (34%) in the placebo group (p=0·8).
Two administrations of botulinum toxin A, each of which comprised several injections, have a sustained analgesic effect against peripheral neuropathic pain. Several factors, such as the presence of allodynia and a limited thermal deficit, may be useful in predicting treatment response and should be investigated further.
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) and Fondation CNP (France).
先前的研究数据表明,肉毒杆菌毒素 A 对周围神经性疼痛具有镇痛作用,但证据质量较低。我们旨在评估肉毒杆菌毒素 A 在神经性疼痛患者中重复给药的安全性和疗效。
我们在法国的两家门诊诊所(临床疼痛中心,APHP,布洛涅-比扬古;神经病学中心,杜普伊特伦医院,里摩日)和巴西的一家诊所(FMUSP 附属医院神经病学系,圣保罗)进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。18-85 岁的周围神经性疼痛患者按块随机分配(1:1),根据中央时间表,接受两次皮下肉毒杆菌毒素 A(最多 300 单位)或安慰剂注射,间隔 12 周。所有患者和研究人员均对治疗分组进行了盲法处理。主要结局是肉毒杆菌毒素 A 与安慰剂相比的疗效,通过首次给药后 24 周内自我报告的每周平均疼痛强度的变化来衡量。主要疗效分析是意向治疗人群的混合模型重复测量分析。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT01251211。
2010 年 10 月 2 日至 2013 年 8 月 2 日期间,共纳入 152 名患者,其中 68 名被随机分配(每组 34 名),66 名(37 名[56%]男性)被纳入主要分析(肉毒杆菌毒素 A 组 34 名,安慰剂组 32 名)。与安慰剂相比,肉毒杆菌毒素 A 降低了 24 周内的疼痛强度(调整后的效应估计值-0.77,95%CI-0.95 至-0.59;p<0.0001)。仅报告了注射时疼痛这一不良反应,肉毒杆菌毒素 A 组有 19 名(56%)参与者和安慰剂组有 17 名(53%)参与者出现该不良反应(p=1.0)。肉毒杆菌毒素 A 组有 10 名(29%)参与者出现严重疼痛,安慰剂组有 11 名(34%)参与者出现严重疼痛(p=0.8)。
两次肉毒杆菌毒素 A 给药,每次包括多次注射,对周围神经性疼痛具有持续的镇痛作用。一些因素,如感觉过敏和热缺陷有限,可能有助于预测治疗反应,应进一步研究。
法国国家健康与医学研究院(INSERM)和 CNP 基金会。