Akca A Eralp, Akca Gülçin, Topçu Fulya Toksoy, Macit Enis, Pikdöken Levent, Özgen I Şerif
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Istanbul Kemerburgaz University, Mahmutbey, 34217 Istanbul, Turkey.
Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Medical Microbiology, Emek, 06510 Ankara, Turkey.
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:3627463. doi: 10.1155/2016/3627463. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Actinomyces israelii, Candida albicans, and their single-species biofilms by agar dilution and broth microdilution test methods. Both agents inhibited the growth of all planktonic species. On the other hand, CHX exhibited lower minimum bactericidal concentrations than EEP against biofilms of A. actinomycetemcomitans, S. aureus, and E. faecalis whereas EEP yielded a better result against Lactobacilli and P. intermedia. The bactericidal and fungicidal concentrations of both agents were found to be equal against biofilms of Streptecocci, P. gingivalis, A. israelii, and C. albicans. The results of this study revealed that propolis was more effective in inhibiting Gram-positive bacteria than the Gram-negative bacteria in their planktonic state and it was suggested that EEP could be as effective as CHX on oral microorganisms in their biofilm state.
本研究旨在通过琼脂稀释法和肉汤微量稀释法,比较蜂胶乙醇提取物(EEP)和葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHX)对浮游状态的变形链球菌、远缘链球菌、嗜酸乳杆菌、唾液乳杆菌唾液亚种、伴放线聚集杆菌、中间普氏菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、粪肠球菌、衣氏放线菌、白色念珠菌及其单菌种生物膜的抗菌效果。两种药物均能抑制所有浮游菌种的生长。另一方面,对于伴放线聚集杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和粪肠球菌的生物膜,CHX的最低杀菌浓度低于EEP,而EEP对乳杆菌和中间普氏菌的效果更好。发现两种药物对链球菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌、衣氏放线菌和白色念珠菌生物膜的杀菌和杀真菌浓度相等。本研究结果表明,蜂胶在抑制浮游状态的革兰氏阳性菌方面比革兰氏阴性菌更有效,并且提示EEP在生物膜状态下对口腔微生物的效果可能与CHX相当。