Spoorenberg S M C, Bos W J W, van Hannen E J, Dijkstra F, Heddema E R, van Velzen-Blad H, Heijligenberg R, Grutters J C, de Jongh B M
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Neth J Med. 2016 Feb;74(2):75-81.
Of all hospitalised community-acquired pneumonias (CAPs) only a few are known to be caused by Chlamydia psittaci. Most likely the reported incidence, ranging from of 0% to 2.1%, is an underestimation of the real incidence, since detection of psittacosis is frequently not incorporated in the routine microbiological diagnostics in CAP or serological methods are used.
C. psittaci real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was routinely performed on the sputum of 147 patients hospitalised with CAP, who participated in a clinical trial conducted in two Dutch hospitals. In 119/147 patients the paired complement fixation test (CFT) was also performed for the presence of Chlamydia antibodies. Positive CFTs were investigated by micro- Immunofluorescence for psittacosis specificity. Case criteria for psittacosis were a positive PCR or a fourfold rise of antibody titre in CFT confirmed by micro- Immunofluorescence. Furthermore, we searched for parameters that could discriminate psittacosis from CAPs with other aetiology.
7/147 (4.8%) patients were diagnosed with psittacosis: six with PCR and one patient with a negative PCR, but with CFT confirmed by micro- Immunofluorescence. Psittacosis patients had had a higher temperature (median 39.6 vs. 38.2 °C;) but lower white blood cell count (median 7.4 vs. 13.7 x 109/l) on admission compared with other CAP patients.
In this study, C. psittaci as CAP-causing pathogen was much higher than previously reported. To detect psittacosis, PCR was performed on all CAP patients for whom a sputum sample was available. For clinical use, PCR is a fast method and sputum availability allows genotyping; additional serology can optimise epidemiological investigations.
在所有住院的社区获得性肺炎(CAP)中,已知只有少数由鹦鹉热衣原体引起。报告的发病率在0%至2.1%之间,很可能低估了实际发病率,因为鹦鹉热的检测在CAP的常规微生物诊断中常未纳入,或采用的是血清学方法。
对147例因CAP住院并参与荷兰两家医院进行的一项临床试验的患者痰液常规进行鹦鹉热衣原体实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测。119/147例患者还进行了衣原体抗体的配对补体结合试验(CFT)。对CFT阳性结果通过微量免疫荧光法检测鹦鹉热特异性。鹦鹉热的病例标准为PCR阳性或经微量免疫荧光法确认的CFT抗体滴度四倍升高。此外,我们寻找能够区分鹦鹉热与其他病因CAP的参数。
7/147(4.8%)例患者被诊断为鹦鹉热:6例PCR阳性,1例PCR阴性,但CFT经微量免疫荧光法确认。与其他CAP患者相比,鹦鹉热患者入院时体温较高(中位数39.6对38.2℃),但白细胞计数较低(中位数7.4对13.7×10⁹/L)。
在本研究中,鹦鹉热衣原体作为引起CAP的病原体比先前报道的要高得多。为检测鹦鹉热,对所有可获得痰液样本的CAP患者进行了PCR检测。就临床应用而言,PCR是一种快速方法,且痰液可获得性允许进行基因分型;额外的血清学检查可优化流行病学调查。