Liu Y F, Sun F F, Wan F C, Zhao H B, Liu X M, You W, Cheng H J, Liu G F, Tan X W, Song E L
Shandong Key Lab of Animal Disease Control and Breeding, Ji'nan, Shandong 250100, China.
Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji'nan, Shandong 250100, China.
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2016 May;29(5):659-65. doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0445. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
The effects of three different feeding systems on beef cattle production performance, rumen fermentation, and rumen digesta particle structure were investigated by using 18 Limousin (steers) with a similar body weight (575±10 kg) in a 80-d experiment. The animals were equally and randomly divided into three treatment groups, namely, total mixed ration group (cattle fed TMR), SI1 group (cattle fed concentrate firstly then roughage), and SI2 group (cattle fed roughage firstly then concentrate). The results showed that the average daily gain was significantly higher in cattle receiving TMR than in those receiving SI1 and SI2 (p<0.05). Consumption per kg weight gain of concentrate, silage, and combined net energy (NEmf) were significantly decreased when cattle received TMR, unlike when they received SI1 and SI2 (p<0.05), indicating that the feed efficiency of TMR was the highest. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was significantly decreased when cattle received TMR compared with that in cattle receiving SI1 (p<0.05), whereas there was no difference compared with that in cattle receiving SI2. Ammonia nitrogen concentration was significantly lower in cattle receiving TMR than in those receiving SI1 and SI2 (p<0.05). The rumen area of cattle that received TMR was significantly larger than that of cattle receiving SI1 (p<0.05), but there was no difference compared with that of cattle receiving SI2. Although there was no significant difference among the three feeding systems in rumen digesta particle distribution, the TMR group trended to have fewer large- and medium-sized particles and more small-sized particles than those in the SI1 and SI2 groups. In conclusion, cattle with dietary TMR showed increased weight gain and ruminal development and decreased BUN. This indicated that TMR feeding was more conducive toward improving the production performance and rumen fermentation of beef cattle.
在一项为期80天的试验中,选用18头体重相近(575±10千克)的利木赞阉牛,研究了三种不同饲养方式对肉牛生产性能、瘤胃发酵及瘤胃消化物颗粒结构的影响。将试验动物平均随机分为三个处理组,即全混合日粮组(牛饲喂全混合日粮)、SI1组(牛先喂精料后喂粗料)和SI2组(牛先喂粗料后喂精料)。结果表明,采食全混合日粮的牛平均日增重显著高于采食SI1和SI2的牛(p<0.05)。与采食SI1和SI2的牛不同,采食全混合日粮的牛每千克体重增加的精料、青贮料消耗量及综合净能(NEmf)显著降低(p<0.05),表明全混合日粮的饲料效率最高。与采食SI1的牛相比,采食全混合日粮的牛血尿素氮(BUN)显著降低(p<0.05),而与采食SI2的牛相比无差异。采食全混合日粮的牛氨氮浓度显著低于采食SI1和SI2的牛(p<0.05)。采食全混合日粮的牛瘤胃面积显著大于采食SI1的牛(p<0.05),但与采食SI2的牛相比无差异。尽管三种饲养方式在瘤胃消化物颗粒分布上无显著差异,但全混合日粮组的大、中颗粒数量有少于SI1和SI2组、小颗粒数量多于SI1和SI2组的趋势。总之,日粮为全混合日粮的牛增重增加、瘤胃发育改善且血尿素氮降低。这表明全混合日粮饲养更有利于提高肉牛的生产性能和瘤胃发酵。