Suppr超能文献

传统窝沟封闭剂与表面预反应玻璃离子技术释放和再充氟的比较研究

Comparative study of fluoride released and recharged from conventional pit and fissure sealants versus surface prereacted glass ionomer technology.

作者信息

Salmerón-Valdés Elias Nahum, Scougall-Vilchis Rogelio J, Alanis-Tavira Jorge, Morales-Luckie Raúl Alberto

机构信息

Dental Research Center "Dr. Keisaburo Miyata", School of Dentistry, Autonomus University State of Mexico, Toluca, México.

Sustainable Chemical Research Center, School of Chemistry, Autonomus University State of Mexico, Toluca, México.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;19(1):41-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.173197.

Abstract

CONTEXT

The fluoride release of sealants in vitro shows a marked decrease. Giomers are distinguishable from manufactured resin-based sealants and contain prereacted glass-ionomer particles (PRG).

AIMS

To compare the amounts of fluoride released from the main pit and fissure of a resin-based sealant with that from a Giomer and to assess the abilities of the sealant and the Giomer to recharge when exposed to regular use of fluoride rinse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The readings for the fluoride concentration were carried out for 60 days using a fluoride ion-specific electrode. After this period, the samples were recharged using a fluoride mouth rinse. The amount of fluoride released after this recharge was determined for 5 days. The data were analyzed using Student's t- and analysis of variance tests.

RESULTS

In general, all materials presented higher fluoride release in the first 24 h; G1 and G4 showed a higher fluoride release in this period. On the other hand, G3 and G1 presented the most constant fluoride release until the 8(th) day, wherein all the sealants considerably decreased in the amount of fluoride released.

CONCLUSION

G1 and G3 released higher concentrations of fluoride, although no significant differences were found. Giomers recharged in the first 24 h after polymerization presented an improved and sustained fluoride release.

摘要

背景

窝沟封闭剂在体外的氟释放量显著下降。聚粉玻璃离子水门汀与人工合成的树脂基窝沟封闭剂不同,含有预反应的玻璃离子颗粒(PRG)。

目的

比较树脂基窝沟封闭剂与聚粉玻璃离子水门汀在主要窝沟处的氟释放量,并评估窝沟封闭剂和聚粉玻璃离子水门汀在定期使用含氟漱口水时的再充氟能力。

材料与方法

使用氟离子特异性电极进行60天的氟浓度读数。在此期间过后,使用含氟漱口水对样本进行再充氟。测定再充氟后5天内的氟释放量。使用学生t检验和方差分析对数据进行分析。

结果

总体而言,所有材料在前24小时的氟释放量更高;G1和G4在此期间的氟释放量更高。另一方面,G3和G1在第8天前的氟释放最为稳定,在此期间所有窝沟封闭剂的氟释放量均大幅下降。

结论

G1和G3释放的氟浓度更高,尽管未发现显著差异。聚合后最初24小时内再充氟的聚粉玻璃离子水门汀呈现出改善且持续的氟释放。

相似文献

6
Fluoride release and uptake abilities of different fissure sealants.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2016 Jul 1;8(3):e284-9. doi: 10.4317/jced.52775. eCollection 2016 Jul.
7
Evaluation of the ion-releasing and recharging abilities of a resin-based fissure sealant containing S-PRG filler.
Dent Mater J. 2011;30(6):923-7. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2011-124. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
8
Fluoride release and recharging ability of new dental sealants.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2016 Feb;17(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s40368-015-0200-1. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
9
Fluoride release and fluoride-recharging ability of three different sealants.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020 Jul-Sep;38(3):247-252. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_345_19.

引用本文的文献

2
One-year follow-up of microscopical and clinical behavior of bioactive self-etching resin sealant.
J Conserv Dent. 2023 Mar-Apr;26(2):188-193. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_582_22. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
3
Enhancement of fluoride release in glass ionomer cements modified with titanium dioxide nanoparticles.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Nov 4;101(44):e31434. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031434.
4
Remineralizing Effects of Resin-Based Dental Sealants: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Feb 17;14(4):779. doi: 10.3390/polym14040779.
5
Preliminary In Vitro Study of Fluoride Release from Selected Ormocer Materials.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Apr 27;14(9):2244. doi: 10.3390/ma14092244.
6
Comparison of Fluoride Release in Conventional Glass-Ionomer Cements with a New Mechanical Mixing Cement.
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020 Jul 4;18(2):319-323. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a44034.
7
Giomers in dentistry - at the boundary between dental composites and glass-ionomers.
Med Pharm Rep. 2019 Apr;92(2):123-128. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1169. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

本文引用的文献

1
An estimation of fluoride release from various dental restorative materials at different pH: In vitro study.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Apr-Jun;30(2):122-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.99983.
2
3
Antibacterial surface properties of fluoride-containing resin-based sealants.
J Dent. 2010 May;38(5):387-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.01.005. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
5
Fluoride release of six restorative materials in water and pH-cycling solutions.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Oct;15(5):406-11. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000500006.
6
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in children and adolescents.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub2.
9
Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite.
Dent Mater. 2004 Nov;20(9):789-95. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.009.
10
Systemic versus topical fluoride.
Caries Res. 2004 May-Jun;38(3):258-62. doi: 10.1159/000077764.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验