*PC Vogelenzang,Bennebroek.
**polikliniek psychiatrie,academisch ziekenhuis,Leiden.
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 1996 Sep;8(3):56-63. doi: 10.1017/S092427080003708X.
Translation of a specific instrument to measure psychomotor retardation, the "Widlöcher Retardation Rating Scale" and validation of this Dutch translation (Widlöcher remmingsschaal, WRS).
In three separate studies, we studied reliability (n = 26), concurrent and divergent validity (n = 25) and predictive validity (n = 28) of the WRS. In- and outpatients with a depressive disorder or schizophrenia participated, and scores on the WRS were compared with those on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and retardation items of the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS).
The internal consistency was good (Cronbach alpha = 0.86), interrater reliability was sufficient to good, the correlation between the sumscores of both raters was r = 0.84, n = 23, p <0.01 and the kappa's were between 0.23 and 0.80. Convergent and divergent validity showed in comparing the correlation between the sum scores on the WRS and the CPRS retardation items (r = 0.91, n = 25, p < 0.01 ) with the correlation between the sumscores on the WRS and the MADRS (r = 0.40, n = 25, p = 0.1). The decrease of the sum scores on the WRS after two weeks of treatment with antide-pressants predicted remission after six weeks. A subgroup of the patients who were not in remission after six weeks, showed a predominance of retardation signs over mood disturbances. The same clinical picture was seen in a group of patients with a chronic disorder.
De Widlöcher Retardation Rating Scale in this Dutch translation is a usefull instrument to measure psychomotor retardation. The connection between remaining retardation symptoms and longterm prognosis deserves further investigation.
翻译一种专门测量精神运动迟缓的工具,即“Widlöcher 迟缓评定量表”(Widlöcher Remmingsschaal,WRS),并验证其荷兰语翻译本的效度。
在三项独立研究中,我们研究了 WRS 的信度(n=26)、同时效度(n=25)和预测效度(n=28)。研究对象包括抑郁症或精神分裂症的门诊和住院患者,将 WRS 评分与蒙哥马利抑郁评定量表(MADRS)和综合性精神病理评定量表(CPRS)中的迟缓条目评分进行比较。
内部一致性良好(Cronbach α=0.86),评分者间信度充足至良好,两位评分者的总分之间的相关性为 r=0.84,n=23,p<0.01,kappa 值在 0.23 到 0.80 之间。在比较 WRS 总分与 CPRS 迟缓条目(r=0.91,n=25,p<0.01)之间的相关性,与 WRS 总分与 MADRS(r=0.40,n=25,p=0.1)之间的相关性时,显示出了同时效度和区分效度。抗抑郁药物治疗两周后 WRS 总分的下降预测了六周后的缓解。在六周后仍未缓解的患者亚组中,迟缓症状的出现多于情绪障碍。在一组慢性疾病患者中也观察到了同样的临床情况。
在本荷兰语翻译中,Widlöcher 迟缓评定量表是一种有用的测量精神运动迟缓的工具。需要进一步研究残留的迟缓症状与长期预后之间的关系。