El-Haddad Nouhad, Spooner Catherine, Faruqi Nighat, Denney-Wilson Elizabeth, Harris Mark
Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, UNSW Australia, New South Wales, Australia ; Centre for Obesity Management and Prevention Excellence in Primary Health Care, UNSW Australia, New South Wales, Australia.
Centre for Obesity Management and Prevention Excellence in Primary Health Care, UNSW Australia, New South Wales, Australia ; Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMC Obes. 2016 Mar 9;3:16. doi: 10.1186/s40608-016-0097-1. eCollection 2016.
Weight management education is one of the key strategies to assist patients to manage their weight. Educational resources provide an important adjunct in the chain of communication between practitioners and patients. However, one in five Australian adults has low health literacy. The purpose of this study was to assess the readability and analyse the content of weight management resources.
This study is based on the analysis of 23 resources found in the waiting rooms of ten Sydney-based general practices and downloaded from two clinical software packages used at these practices. The reading grade level of these resources was calculated using the Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Fry Readability Graph, and the Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook. Resources' content was analysed for the presence of dietary, physical activity, and behaviour change elements, as recommended by the Clinical practice guidelines for the management of overweight and obesity in adults, adolescents, and children in Australia.
The resources' average reading grade level was for a 10(th) grader (9.5 ± 1.8). These findings highlight that the average reading grade level was two grades higher than the recommended reading grade level for health education resources of 8th grade level or below. Seventy percent of resources contained dietary and behaviour change elements. Physical activity was included in half of the resources. Two messages were identified to be inconsistent with the guidelines and three messages had no scientific basis.
A body of evidence now exists that supports the need to develop evidence-based education resources for weight management that place low demand on literacy, without compromising content accuracy. The findings from this study suggest that there is significant room for improvement in the educational resources provided in general practices.
体重管理教育是帮助患者控制体重的关键策略之一。教育资源是从业者与患者沟通链条中的重要辅助手段。然而,五分之一的澳大利亚成年人健康素养较低。本研究的目的是评估体重管理资源的可读性并分析其内容。
本研究基于对在悉尼的十家全科诊所候诊室找到的23份资源的分析,这些资源是从这些诊所使用的两个临床软件包中下载的。使用弗莱什易读性、弗莱什-金凯德年级水平、弗莱可读性图表和简化的天书测量法来计算这些资源的阅读年级水平。根据澳大利亚成人、青少年和儿童超重与肥胖管理临床实践指南的建议,对资源内容进行分析,看是否包含饮食、身体活动和行为改变要素。
这些资源的平均阅读年级水平相当于十年级学生(9.5±1.8)。这些发现突出表明,平均阅读年级水平比健康教育资源推荐的八年级及以下阅读年级水平高出两个年级。70%的资源包含饮食和行为改变要素。一半的资源包含身体活动内容。有两条信息被确定与指南不一致,三条信息没有科学依据。
现在有大量证据支持有必要开发基于证据的体重管理教育资源,这些资源对读写能力要求低,同时不影响内容准确性。本研究结果表明,全科诊所提供的教育资源有很大的改进空间。