• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算能力调节任务无关情感对概率加权的影响。

Numeracy moderates the influence of task-irrelevant affect on probability weighting.

机构信息

SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Faculty in Wroclaw, Ostrowskiego 30b, 53-238 Wroclaw, Poland.

SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Faculty in Wroclaw, Ostrowskiego 30b, 53-238 Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

Cognition. 2016 Jun;151:37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.002
PMID:26968007
Abstract

Statistical numeracy, defined as the ability to understand and process statistical and probability information, plays a significant role in superior decision making. However, recent research has demonstrated that statistical numeracy goes beyond simple comprehension of numbers and mathematical operations. On the contrary to previous studies that were focused on emotions integral to risky prospects, we hypothesized that highly numerate individuals would exhibit more linear probability weighting because they would be less biased by incidental and decision-irrelevant affect. Participants were instructed to make a series of insurance decisions preceded by negative (i.e., fear-inducing) or neutral stimuli. We found that incidental negative affect increased the curvature of the probability weighting function (PWF). Interestingly, this effect was significant only for less numerate individuals, while probability weighting in more numerate people was not altered by decision-irrelevant affect. We propose two candidate mechanisms for the observed effect.

摘要

统计数字素养,即理解和处理统计与概率信息的能力,在做出更好的决策方面起着重要作用。然而,最近的研究表明,统计数字素养不仅仅是对数字和数学运算的简单理解。与之前专注于风险前景中不可或缺的情绪的研究相反,我们假设高数字素养的个体将表现出更线性的概率权重,因为他们受偶然和决策不相关的影响的偏差更小。参与者被要求在一系列保险决策之前做出一系列保险决策,这些决策之前有负面(即引起恐惧)或中性刺激。我们发现偶然的负面情绪会增加概率加权函数(PWF)的曲率。有趣的是,这种影响仅在数字素养较低的个体中显著,而决策不相关的情绪不会改变数字素养较高的人的概率权重。我们为观察到的效应提出了两个候选机制。

相似文献

1
Numeracy moderates the influence of task-irrelevant affect on probability weighting.计算能力调节任务无关情感对概率加权的影响。
Cognition. 2016 Jun;151:37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
2
Does Fear Increase Search Effort in More Numerate People? An Experimental Study Investigating Information Acquisition in a Decision From Experience Task.恐惧会增加数字能力更强的人的信息搜索努力吗?一项关于经验性决策任务中信息获取的实验研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 3;9:1203. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01203. eCollection 2018.
3
Numeracy and decision making.算术能力与决策制定。
Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):407-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x.
4
Does mental number line training work? The effects of cognitive training on real-life mathematics, numeracy, and decision making.心智数轴训练是否有效?认知训练对现实生活中的数学、计算能力和决策的影响。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2019 Sep;25(3):372-385. doi: 10.1037/xap0000207. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
5
The role of numeracy and approximate number system acuity in predicting value and probability distortion.数字能力和近似数字系统敏锐度在预测价值和概率扭曲方面的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1820-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0849-9.
6
The influence of number line estimation precision and numeracy on risky financial decision making.数线估计精度和计算能力对风险金融决策的影响。
Int J Psychol. 2019 Aug;54(4):530-538. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12475. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
7
The moderating role of objective and subjective numeracy in attribute framing.客观与主观数字能力在属性框架中的调节作用。
Int J Psychol. 2016 Apr;51(2):109-16. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12138. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
8
Numeracy and the Motivational Mind: The Power of Numeric Self-efficacy.数字素养与动机思维:数字自我效能感的力量。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Aug;42(6):729-740. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221099904. Epub 2022 May 18.
9
Multiple numeric competencies: When a number is not just a number.多项数字能力:数字不只是数字。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 May;108(5):802-22. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000019. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
10
Intuitive symbolic magnitude judgments and decision making under risk in adults.成人直觉符号数量判断和风险下的决策。
Cogn Psychol. 2020 May;118:101273. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101273. Epub 2020 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Attentional dynamics of evidence accumulation explain why more numerate people make better decisions under risk.注意证据积累的动态变化可以解释为什么计算能力更强的人在风险下做出更好的决策。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 13;14(1):18788. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68969-5.
2
Context Matters: Emotional Sensitivity to Probabilities and the Bias for Action in Cancer Treatment Decisions.情境很重要:癌症治疗决策中对概率的情绪敏感性和行动倾向。
Med Decis Making. 2023 May;43(4):417-429. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231161341. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
3
Worry, Risk Perception, and Controllability Predict Intentions Toward COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors.
担忧、风险认知和可控性预测对新冠病毒预防行为的意向。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 19;11:582720. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582720. eCollection 2020.
4
The loss-bet paradox: Actuaries, accountants, and other numerate people rate numerically inferior gambles as superior.损失赌注悖论:精算师、会计师和其他有数学头脑的人认为数字上较差的赌博更具优势。
J Behav Decis Mak. 2019 Jan;32(1):15-29. doi: 10.1002/bdm.2085. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
5
Determinants of Probability Neglect and Risk Attitudes for Disaster Risk: An Online Experimental Study of Flood Insurance Demand among Homeowners.灾害风险概率忽视和风险态度的决定因素:基于房主洪水保险需求的在线实验研究。
Risk Anal. 2019 Nov;39(11):2514-2527. doi: 10.1111/risa.13361. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
6
Affect and Decision Making: Insights and Predictions from Computational Models.情感与决策:计算模型的洞察与预测。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Jul;23(7):602-614. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Does Fear Increase Search Effort in More Numerate People? An Experimental Study Investigating Information Acquisition in a Decision From Experience Task.恐惧会增加数字能力更强的人的信息搜索努力吗?一项关于经验性决策任务中信息获取的实验研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 3;9:1203. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01203. eCollection 2018.
8
Improving numeracy through values affirmation enhances decision and STEM outcomes.通过价值观肯定提高数字素养可提升决策能力和STEM学习成果。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 12;12(7):e0180674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180674. eCollection 2017.
9
The Affective Bases of Risk Perception: Negative Feelings and Stress Mediate the Relationship between Mental Imagery and Risk Perception.风险感知的情感基础:负面情绪和压力介导心理意象与风险感知之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 24;7:932. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00932. eCollection 2016.