• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
End-of-life care decisions for haemodialysis patients - 'We only tend to have that discussion with them when they start deteriorating'.血液透析患者的临终护理决策——“我们往往只在他们病情开始恶化时才会与他们进行那次讨论”。
Health Expect. 2017 Apr;20(2):260-273. doi: 10.1111/hex.12454. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
2
Advance care plan barriers in older patients with end-stage renal disease: a qualitative nephrologist interview study.晚期肾病老年患者的预先医疗指示障碍:一项定性肾病学家访谈研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Dec;10(4):e39. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001759. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
3
Thinking ahead--the need for early Advance Care Planning for people on haemodialysis: A qualitative interview study.未雨绸缪——血液透析患者早期预立医疗照护计划的必要性:一项定性访谈研究
Palliat Med. 2015 May;29(5):443-50. doi: 10.1177/0269216314560209. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
4
Discussing Conservative Management With Older Patients With CKD: An Interview Study of Nephrologists.与老年慢性肾脏病患者讨论保守治疗:对肾脏病医生的访谈研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 May;71(5):627-635. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.11.011. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
Thinking ahead about medical treatments in advanced illness: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers in end-of-life care planning with patients and families from ethnically diverse backgrounds.预先思考晚期疾病的医疗治疗:对不同种族背景的终末期患者和家庭进行临终关怀规划的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(7):1-135. doi: 10.3310/JVFW4781.
6
Shared decision-making in end-stage renal disease: a protocol for a multi-center study of a communication intervention to improve end-of-life care for dialysis patients.终末期肾病中的共同决策:一项关于沟通干预的多中心研究方案,旨在改善透析患者的临终护理。
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Jun 12;14:30. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0027-x.
7
The differing perspectives of doctors and nurses in end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit: A qualitative study.重症监护室中医生和护士在临终决策方面的不同观点:一项定性研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2020 Jul;33(4):311-316. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
Communication and Decision-Making About End-of-Life Care in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房中关于临终关怀的沟通与决策
Am J Crit Care. 2017 Jul;26(4):336-341. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2017774.
9
Palliative care nursing involvement in end-of-life decision-making: Qualitative secondary analysis.姑息护理护理在临终决策中的参与:定性二次分析。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Sep;26(6):1680-1695. doi: 10.1177/0969733018774610. Epub 2018 May 28.
10
Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.患者对于与医生交流临终决策的偏好。支持性治疗研究组。了解预后及对治疗结果和风险的偏好研究。
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 1;127(1):1-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-1-199707010-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating Clinical Reasoning Into a Patient Decision Aid for People Making Conservative Kidney Management and Dialysis Decisions: A User-Centered Intervention Development Design.将临床推理融入针对进行保守肾脏管理和透析决策的患者的决策辅助工具:以用户为中心的干预开发设计。
Kidney Med. 2025 Feb 24;7(5):100984. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2025.100984. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Participation in eHealth Communication Interventions Among Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: Scoping Review.参与血液透析患者的电子健康沟通干预措施:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 11;26:e51900. doi: 10.2196/51900.
3
Feasibility and acceptability of the ShareD dEciSIon making for patients with kidney failuRE to improve end-of-life care intervention: A pilot multicentre randomised controlled trial.为改善肾衰竭患者临终关怀而开展的共享决策干预的可行性与可接受性:一项多中心随机对照试验试点研究
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Aug 5;7:100231. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100231. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Development of a Resource for Health Professionals to Raise Advance Care Planning Topics During Kidney Care Consultations: A Multiple User-Centered Design.开发一种资源,供医疗专业人员在肾脏护理咨询期间提出预先护理计划主题:一种多用户中心设计。
Kidney Med. 2024 Jul 18;6(9):100874. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100874. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
The Surprise Question and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients on Hemodialysis: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study.血液透析患者的意外问题与健康相关生活质量:一项横断面多中心研究
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Aug 2;5(1):306-315. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0093. eCollection 2024.
6
Facilitators and Barriers to Receiving Palliative Care in People with Kidney Disease: Predictive Factors from an International Nursing Perspective.肾病患者接受姑息治疗的促进因素和障碍:从国际护理角度看预测因素
Nurs Rep. 2024 Jan 22;14(1):220-229. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14010018.
7
Advance care planning for patients with end-stage kidney disease on dialysis: narrative review of the current evidence, and future considerations.终末期肾病透析患者的预先医疗照护计划:当前证据的叙述性回顾,以及未来的考虑。
J Nephrol. 2024 Apr;37(3):547-560. doi: 10.1007/s40620-023-01841-3. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
8
Unravelling complex choices: multi-stakeholder perceptions on dialysis withdrawal and end-of-life care in kidney disease.揭示复杂的选择:多方利益相关者对肾病透析撤机和终末期关怀的看法。
BMC Nephrol. 2024 Jan 3;25(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03434-5.
9
Characterizing end-of-life communication in families.描述家庭中的临终沟通。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2023 Sep 4;17:26323524231193033. doi: 10.1177/26323524231193033. eCollection 2023.
10
Kidney Clinicians' Perceptions of Challenges and Aspirations to Improve End-Of-Life Care Provision.肾脏科临床医生对改善临终关怀服务的挑战与期望的看法。
Kidney Int Rep. 2023 Jun 8;8(8):1627-1637. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.04.031. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Advance care planning and end-of-life decision making in dialysis: a randomized controlled trial targeting patients and their surrogates.透析中的预先护理计划与临终决策:一项针对患者及其代理人的随机对照试验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Nov;66(5):813-22. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.018. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
2
Predicting Early Death Among Elderly Dialysis Patients: Development and Validation of a Risk Score to Assist Shared Decision Making for Dialysis Initiation.预测老年透析患者的早期死亡:用于辅助透析起始共同决策的风险评分的开发与验证
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Dec;66(6):1024-32. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
3
US Renal Data System 2014 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States.美国肾脏数据系统2014年年报:美国肾脏疾病流行病学
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jul;66(1 Suppl 1):Svii, S1-305. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.001.
4
Shared decision-making in end-stage renal disease: a protocol for a multi-center study of a communication intervention to improve end-of-life care for dialysis patients.终末期肾病中的共同决策:一项关于沟通干预的多中心研究方案,旨在改善透析患者的临终护理。
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Jun 12;14:30. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0027-x.
5
Human factors and ergonomics and quality improvement science: integrating approaches for safety in healthcare.人因工程学与质量改进科学:整合医疗保健安全方法。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Apr;24(4):250-4. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003623. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
6
Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services.患者和工作人员作为医疗服务的共同设计者。
BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7714. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7714.
7
Improving End-of-Life Communication and Decision Making: The Development of a Conceptual Framework and Quality Indicators.改善临终沟通与决策:概念框架及质量指标的制定
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Jun;49(6):1070-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
8
Thinking ahead--the need for early Advance Care Planning for people on haemodialysis: A qualitative interview study.未雨绸缪——血液透析患者早期预立医疗照护计划的必要性:一项定性访谈研究
Palliat Med. 2015 May;29(5):443-50. doi: 10.1177/0269216314560209. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
9
Advance care planning for adults with CKD: a systematic integrative review.成人慢性肾脏病患者的预先医疗照护计划:系统综合评价。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 May;63(5):761-70. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
10
Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making.知识并非患者的力量:系统综述和主题综合分析患者报告的共享决策障碍和促进因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Mar;94(3):291-309. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031. Epub 2013 Nov 9.

血液透析患者的临终护理决策——“我们往往只在他们病情开始恶化时才会与他们进行那次讨论”。

End-of-life care decisions for haemodialysis patients - 'We only tend to have that discussion with them when they start deteriorating'.

作者信息

Lazenby Sophia, Edwards Adrian, Samuriwo Raymond, Riley Stephen, Murray Mary Ann, Carson-Stevens Andrew

机构信息

Primary Care Patient Safety (PISA) Research Group, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.

Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2017 Apr;20(2):260-273. doi: 10.1111/hex.12454. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12454
PMID:26968338
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5354044/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Haemodialysis patients receive very little involvement in their end-of-life care decisions. Issues relating to death and dying are commonly avoided until late in their illness. This study aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of doctors and nurses in nephrology for involving haemodialysis patients in end-of-life care decisions.

METHODS

A semi-structured qualitative interview study with 15 doctors and five nurses and thematic analysis of their accounts was conducted. The setting was a large teaching hospital in Wales, UK.

RESULTS

Prognosis is not routinely discussed with patients, in part due to a difficulty in estimation and the belief that patients do not want or need this information. Advance care planning is rarely carried out, and end-of-life care discussions are seldom initiated prior to patient deterioration. There is variability in end-of-life practices amongst nephrologists; some patients are felt to be withdrawn from dialysis too late. Furthermore, the possibility and implications of withdrawal are not commonly discussed with well patients. Critical barriers hindering better end-of-life care involvement for these patients are outlined.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provides insights into the complexity of end-of-life conversations and the barriers to achieving better end-of-life communication practices. The results identify opportunities for improving the lives and deaths of haemodialysis patients.

摘要

背景

血液透析患者在临终护理决策中很少参与。与死亡和临终相关的问题通常在疾病晚期才会被回避。本研究旨在探讨肾脏科医生和护士让血液透析患者参与临终护理决策的经历和看法。

方法

对15名医生和5名护士进行了半结构化定性访谈研究,并对他们的叙述进行了主题分析。研究地点是英国威尔士的一家大型教学医院。

结果

预后情况通常不与患者常规讨论,部分原因是难以估计,且认为患者不想要或不需要这些信息。预先护理计划很少实施,临终护理讨论很少在患者病情恶化之前启动。肾脏科医生在临终实践方面存在差异;一些患者被撤下透析的时间太晚。此外,撤下透析的可能性及其影响通常不与病情稳定的患者讨论。概述了阻碍这些患者更好地参与临终护理的关键障碍。

结论

该研究揭示了临终谈话的复杂性以及实现更好的临终沟通实践的障碍。研究结果确定了改善血液透析患者生与死状况的机会。