• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孤立性重度创伤性脑损伤患者的死亡率预测因素

Predictors of mortality in patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Strnad Matej, Borovnik Lesjak Vesna, Vujanović Vitka, Križmarić Miljenko

机构信息

Center for Emergency Medicine, Community Health Center Maribor, Prehospital Unit, Ulica talcev 9, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.

Medical Faculty, University of Maribor, Taborska ulica 8, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017 Feb;129(3-4):110-114. doi: 10.1007/s00508-016-0974-0. Epub 2016 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00508-016-0974-0
PMID:26968575
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Many prognostic models predicting mortality in patients with TBI were developed, which also include patients with mild or moderate TBI and patients who suffered major extracranial injuries.

METHODS

From a prospective database, we conducted a retrospective medical chart review covering the period between January 2000 and December 2012 of patients with isolated severe TBI (Abbreviated Injury Score for head, AIS ≥ 3) without extracranial injuries, who were intubated in the field using the rapid sequence intubation method and were of age 16 or more. Prehospital vital signs, Injury Severity Score (ISS) and laboratory tests were compared in two study groups: survivors (n = 25) and non-survivors (n = 27). Selected variables identified during univariate analysis (p < 0.1) were then subjected to multivariate analysis logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that in-hospital mortality was statistically significantly associated with male sex (p = 0.040), ISS (p = 0.005) and mydriasis (p = 0.012). For predicting mortality, area under the curve (AUC) was calculated: for ISS 0.76 (95 % confidence interval, CI; 0.63-0.90; p < 0.001) and for initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 0.64 (95 % CI, 0.49-0.80, p = 0.079). In the multivariate analysis, ISS (odds ratio, OR; 1.19, 95 % CI, 1.06-1.35; p = 0.004) and mydriasis (OR, 5.73; 95 % CI, 1.06-30.88; p = 0.042) were identified as independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. The AUC for the regression model was 0.83 (95 % CI, 0.71-0.94; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In prehospital intubated patients with isolated severe TBI only ISS and mydriasis were found to be independent predictors of in-hospital mortality.

摘要

背景

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是全球范围内死亡和残疾的主要原因。许多预测TBI患者死亡率的预后模型已经建立,其中也包括轻度或中度TBI患者以及遭受严重颅外损伤的患者。

方法

我们从一个前瞻性数据库中进行了一项回顾性病历审查,涵盖2000年1月至2012年12月期间孤立性重度TBI(头部简略损伤评分,AIS≥3)且无颅外损伤的患者,这些患者在现场采用快速顺序插管法进行了插管,年龄在16岁及以上。在两个研究组中比较了院前生命体征、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和实验室检查结果:幸存者(n = 25)和非幸存者(n = 27)。然后将单因素分析(p < 0.1)中确定的选定变量纳入多因素分析逻辑回归模型。

结果

单因素分析显示,院内死亡率与男性(p = 0.040)、ISS(p = 0.005)和瞳孔散大(p = 0.012)在统计学上显著相关。为预测死亡率,计算了曲线下面积(AUC):ISS的AUC为0.76(95%置信区间,CI;0.63 - 0.90;p < 0.001),初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)的AUC为0.64(95%CI,0.49 - 0.80,p = 0.079)。在多因素分析中,ISS(比值比,OR;1.19,95%CI,1.06 - 1.35;p = 0.004)和瞳孔散大(OR,5.73;95%CI,1.06 - 30.88;p = 0.042)被确定为院内死亡率的独立危险因素。回归模型的AUC为0.83(95%CI,0.71 - 0.94;p < 0.001)。

结论

在院前插管的孤立性重度TBI患者中,仅发现ISS和瞳孔散大是院内死亡率的独立预测因素。

相似文献

1
Predictors of mortality in patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury.孤立性重度创伤性脑损伤患者的死亡率预测因素
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017 Feb;129(3-4):110-114. doi: 10.1007/s00508-016-0974-0. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
2
Predictors of Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤预后的预测因素
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;90:525-529. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.012. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
3
Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupil parameters on mortality rate and outcome in pediatric and adult severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study.格拉斯哥昏迷评分和瞳孔参数对儿童和成人严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和预后的影响:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):760-767. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152385. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
4
A comparison of the prehospital motor component of the Glasgow coma scale (mGCS) to the prehospital total GCS (tGCS) as a prehospital risk adjustment measure for trauma patients.院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表(mGCS)的运动成分与院前总格拉斯哥昏迷量表(tGCS)的比较,作为创伤患者的院前风险调整措施。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jan-Mar;18(1):68-75. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.844870.
5
Tracheostomy is associated with decreased hospital mortality after moderate or severe isolated traumatic brain injury.对于中度或重度单纯性创伤性脑损伤患者,气管切开术与降低医院死亡率相关。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016 Jun;128(11-12):397-403. doi: 10.1007/s00508-016-1004-y. Epub 2016 May 25.
6
Predictors of mortality and prehospital monitoring limitations in blunt trauma patients.钝性创伤患者的死亡率预测因素及院前监测局限性
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:983409. doi: 10.1155/2015/983409. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
7
Observed versus expected mortality in pediatric patients intubated in the field with Glasgow Coma Scale scores < 9.现场格拉斯哥昏迷评分 < 9 的小儿患者插管的观察死亡率与预期死亡率。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Oct;45(5):769-776. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-01065-2. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
8
Predictive value of positive high-sensitivity troponin T in intubated traumatic brain injury patients.高敏肌钙蛋白 T 阳性对气管插管创伤性脑损伤患者的预测价值。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec 1;129(6):1541-1549. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.JNS17675. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
9
Prehospital intubation for isolated severe blunt traumatic brain injury: worse outcomes and higher mortality.单纯严重钝性创伤性脑损伤的院前气管插管:预后更差且死亡率更高。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Dec;43(6):731-739. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0718-x. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
10
The predictive value of field versus arrival Glasgow Coma Scale score and TRISS calculations in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.现场与入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分及创伤和损伤严重度评分计算在中重度创伤性脑损伤中的预测价值。
J Trauma. 2006 May;60(5):985-90. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000205860.96209.1c.

引用本文的文献

1
The increased mortality of older patients with moderate traumatic brain injury.中度创伤性脑损伤老年患者死亡率的增加。
CJEM. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1007/s43678-025-00941-2.
2
Incidence and mortality related risk factors in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A meta‑analysis.重型颅脑损伤患者发病率和死亡率的相关危险因素:一项荟萃分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2025 Feb 24;29(4):84. doi: 10.3892/etm.2025.12834. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Assessing the Predictive Utility of the C-Reactive Protein-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Mortality in Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Prehospital intubation in patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury: a 4-year observational study.孤立性严重创伤性脑损伤患者的院前气管插管:一项为期4年的观察性研究。
Crit Care Res Pract. 2014;2014:135986. doi: 10.1155/2014/135986. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
2
Gender impacts mortality after traumatic brain injury in teenagers.性别影响青少年创伤性脑损伤后的死亡率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Oct;75(4):682-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829d024f.
3
Outcome prediction in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a focus on computed tomography variables.
评估C反应蛋白与淋巴细胞比值对单纯性创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率的预测价值:一项单中心回顾性分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 18;14(18):2065. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182065.
4
A Meta-analysis of Predicting Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Models.机器学习模型预测创伤性脑损伤后意识障碍的Meta分析。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 1;25(3):290-303. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231443. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
New diagnosis of cancer in mild and moderate/severe traumatic brain injury patients in a 12-year population-based study.一项基于人群的12年研究中轻度和中度/重度创伤性脑损伤患者新发癌症的诊断情况
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 18;22(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09416-4.
6
Identification of Serious Adverse Events in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injuries, from Prehospital Care to Intensive-Care Unit, Using Early Warning Scores.使用早期预警评分识别创伤性脑损伤患者从院前急救到重症监护病房的严重不良事件。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 26;17(5):1504. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051504.
7
Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury in children: analysis of long-term neuropsychological impairment and review of the literature.儿童重度创伤性脑损伤的减压性颅骨切除术:长期神经心理障碍分析及文献综述
Childs Nerv Syst. 2019 Sep;35(9):1507-1515. doi: 10.1007/s00381-019-04274-1. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
8
Reduced Neuroinflammation and Improved Functional Recovery after Traumatic Brain Injury by Prophylactic Diet Supplementation in Mice.预防性饮食补充可减少创伤性脑损伤后神经炎症和改善功能恢复。
Nutrients. 2019 Jan 31;11(2):299. doi: 10.3390/nu11020299.
9
Association between the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians Score and Mortality in Patients with Isolated Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.亚洲人骨质疏松自我评估工具评分与单纯中度和重度创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率之间的关联:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Dec 3;13(12):1203. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13121203.
中重度创伤性脑损伤的预后预测:着重于计算机断层扫描变量。
Neurocrit Care. 2013 Aug;19(1):79-89. doi: 10.1007/s12028-012-9795-9.
4
Effects of gender on outcomes after traumatic brain injury.性别对创伤性脑损伤后结局的影响。
J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1620-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318226ea0e.
5
Pre-hospital intubation is associated with increased mortality after traumatic brain injury.院前插管与创伤性脑损伤后的死亡率增加有关。
J Surg Res. 2011 Sep;170(1):e117-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 May 4.
6
Predictors of in-hospital mortality and 6-month functional outcomes in older adults after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.中重度创伤性脑损伤后老年人住院死亡率和 6 个月功能结局的预测因素。
Injury. 2009 Sep;40(9):973-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.05.034. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
7
Severe traumatic brain injury: is there a gender difference in mortality?重度创伤性脑损伤:死亡率存在性别差异吗?
Am J Surg. 2009 Feb;197(2):155-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.09.008.
8
Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics.预测创伤性脑损伤后的预后:基于入院特征的预后评分的制定与国际验证
PLoS Med. 2008 Aug 5;5(8):e165; discussion e165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050165.
9
Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients.预测创伤性脑损伤后的结局:基于大量国际患者队列的实用预后模型。
BMJ. 2008 Feb 23;336(7641):425-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39461.643438.25. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
10
The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective.创伤性脑损伤的影响:全球视角
NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(5):341-53.