Llovera Gemma, Liesz Arthur
Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:271-279. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13516. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
For years, low reproducibility of preclinical trials and poor translation of promising preclinical therapies to the clinic have posed major challenges to translational research in most biomedical fields. To overcome the limitations that stand between experimental and clinical research, international consortia have attempted to establish standardized guidelines for study design and for reporting the resulting data. In addition, multicenter preclinical randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) have been proposed as a suitable tool for 'bridging the gap' between experimental research and clinical trials. We recently reported the design and results of the first such pRCT in which we confirmed the feasibility of using a coordinated approach with standardized protocols in collaboration with independent multinational research centers. However, despite its successes, this first pRCT also had several difficulties, particularly with respect to following the protocols established in the study design and analyzing the data. Here, we review our experiences performing the study, and we analyze and discuss the lessons learned from performing the first pRCT. Moreover, we provide suggestions regarding how obstacles can be overcome to improve the performance and outcome of future pRCT studies. Translational research is hampered by low reproducibility of preclinical studies and countless failed clinical trials. International consortia have proposed preclinical multicenter trials as an intermediate step to overcome this 'translational roadblock'. We have recently performed the first such preclinical randomized controlled trial (pRCT) by adopting key elements of clinical study design to preclinical research. In this review, we discuss the lessons learned from this trial and provide suggestions how to optimize future pRCTs. This article is part of the 60th Anniversary special issue.
多年来,临床前试验的低可重复性以及有前景的临床前疗法向临床转化的不佳情况,给大多数生物医学领域的转化研究带来了重大挑战。为克服实验研究与临床研究之间存在的限制,国际联盟已尝试为研究设计和报告所得数据制定标准化指南。此外,多中心临床前随机对照试验(pRCTs)已被提议作为在实验研究和临床试验之间“弥合差距”的合适工具。我们最近报告了首个此类pRCT的设计和结果,其中我们证实了与独立的跨国研究中心合作采用标准化方案的协调方法的可行性。然而,尽管取得了成功,首个pRCT也存在一些困难,特别是在遵循研究设计中制定的方案以及分析数据方面。在此,我们回顾进行该研究的经验,并分析和讨论从首个pRCT中吸取的教训。此外,我们就如何克服障碍以改善未来pRCT研究的表现和结果提供建议。临床前研究的低可重复性和无数失败的临床试验阻碍了转化研究。国际联盟已提议将临床前多中心试验作为克服这一“转化障碍”的中间步骤。我们最近通过将临床研究设计的关键要素应用于临床前研究,开展了首个此类临床前随机对照试验(pRCT)。在本综述中,我们讨论从该试验中吸取的教训,并就如何优化未来的pRCT提供建议。本文是第60周年特刊的一部分。