• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在同一页上?一项关于多实验室临床前研究中合作的定性研究方案。

On the same page? A qualitative study protocol on collaboration in a multi-laboratory preclinical study.

机构信息

DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 25;17(8):e0273077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273077. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0273077
PMID:36006928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9409520/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Medical advancements are slow to reach the patient bedside due to issues with knowledge translation from preclinical studies. Multi-laboratory preclinical studies are a promising strategy for addressing the methodological deficiencies that weaken the translational impact of single laboratory findings. However, multi-laboratory preclinical studies are rare and difficult, requiring strong collaboration to plan and execute a shared protocol. In multiteam systems such as these, collaboration is enhanced when members have cohesive ways of thinking about their goals and how to achieve them-that is, when they have "shared mental models". In this research project, we will examine how members of Canada's first multi-laboratory preclinical study build shared mental models and collaborate in the execution of their study.

METHODS

Six independent labs in Canada will conduct a preclinical study using a common protocol. To investigate mental models and collaboration in this multiteam system we will conduct a longitudinal qualitative study involving interviews at four time points, team observation, and document analysis. We will analyze interview transcripts using deductive coding to produce a matrix analysis of mental model content over time and inductive coding to produce a thematic analysis of members' experiences of collaboration over time. We will also triangulate data sources to "tell the story" of teamwork, capturing events and contextual information that explain changes in mental models and collaboration over time.

DISCUSSION

This study will be one of the most comprehensive longitudinal analyses of a real-world multiteam system, and the first within a preclinical laboratory setting. The results will contribute to our understanding of collaboration in multiteam systems, an organizational form increasingly used to tackle complex scientific and social problems. The results will also inform the implementation of future multi-laboratory preclinical studies, enhancing the likelihood of effective collaboration and improved 'bench to bedside' translation.

摘要

简介

由于从临床前研究到知识转化的问题,医学进展缓慢,难以应用于临床。多实验室临床前研究是解决削弱单一实验室研究转化影响的方法学缺陷的一种很有前途的策略。然而,多实验室临床前研究很少见,而且实施起来非常困难,需要强有力的合作来规划和执行共同的方案。在这种多团队系统中,如果成员在思考目标和实现目标的方法上具有一致性,即当他们具有“共享心智模型”时,协作会得到加强。在这个研究项目中,我们将研究加拿大第一个多实验室临床前研究的成员如何构建共享心智模型,并在执行研究时进行协作。

方法

加拿大的六个独立实验室将使用共同的方案进行临床前研究。为了研究这个多团队系统中的心智模型和协作,我们将进行一项纵向定性研究,包括在四个时间点进行访谈、团队观察和文档分析。我们将使用演绎编码分析访谈记录,以生成心智模型内容随时间变化的矩阵分析,以及使用归纳编码生成成员随时间变化的协作经验的主题分析。我们还将对数据源进行三角验证,以“讲述”团队合作的故事,捕捉随时间变化的心智模型和协作变化的事件和背景信息。

讨论

这项研究将是对真实世界多团队系统进行的最全面的纵向分析之一,也是首个在临床前实验室环境中进行的分析。研究结果将有助于我们理解多团队系统中的协作,这是一种越来越多地用于解决复杂科学和社会问题的组织形式。研究结果还将为未来多实验室临床前研究的实施提供信息,提高有效的协作和改善“从实验室到病床”的转化的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/9409520/d3c9961b1680/pone.0273077.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/9409520/d3c9961b1680/pone.0273077.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/9409520/d3c9961b1680/pone.0273077.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
On the same page? A qualitative study protocol on collaboration in a multi-laboratory preclinical study.在同一页上?一项关于多实验室临床前研究中合作的定性研究方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 25;17(8):e0273077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273077. eCollection 2022.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
What Are Orthopaedic Patients' and Clinical Team Members' Perspectives Regarding Whether and How to Address Mental Health in the Orthopaedic Care Setting? A Qualitative Investigation of Patients With Neck or Back Pain.骨科患者和临床团队成员对于在骨科护理环境中是否以及如何解决心理健康问题的看法是什么?一项针对颈痛或背痛患者的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jul 1;481(7):1415-1429. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002513. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
5
Identifying and understanding factors that affect the translation of therapies from the laboratory to patients: a study protocol.从实验室到患者:确定和理解影响治疗方法转化因素的研究方案。
F1000Res. 2020 Jun 1;9:485. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23663.2. eCollection 2020.
6
Charting a course for collaboration: a multiteam perspective.绘制协作蓝图:多团队视角。
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec;2(4):487-94. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0170-3.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Engaging with patients in research on knowledge translation/implementation science methods: a self study.让患者参与知识转化/实施科学方法的研究:一项自我研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 8;8(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00375-5.
9
Collaboration Between Researchers and Knowledge Users in Health Technology Assessment: A Qualitative Exploratory Study.研究者与卫生技术评估知识使用者合作:定性探索性研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Aug 1;6(8):437-446. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.153.
10
National Preclinical Sepsis Platform: developing a framework for accelerating innovation in Canadian sepsis research.国家临床前脓毒症平台:构建一个加速加拿大脓毒症研究创新的框架。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2021 Mar 19;9(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40635-020-00366-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient engagement in preclinical laboratory research: A scoping review.患者参与临床前实验室研究:范围综述。
EBioMedicine. 2021 Aug;70:103484. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103484. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
2
The Effects of Biological Sex on Sepsis Treatments in Animal Models: A Systematic Review and a Narrative Elaboration on Sex- and Gender-Dependent Differences in Sepsis.生物性别对动物模型中脓毒症治疗的影响:一项关于脓毒症中性别依赖性差异的系统评价与叙述性阐述
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Jun 14;3(6):e0433. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000433. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
National Preclinical Sepsis Platform: developing a framework for accelerating innovation in Canadian sepsis research.
国家临床前脓毒症平台:构建一个加速加拿大脓毒症研究创新的框架。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2021 Mar 19;9(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40635-020-00366-4.
4
Multi-Center Pre-clinical Consortia to Enhance Translation of Therapies and Biomarkers for Traumatic Brain Injury: Operation Brain Trauma Therapy and Beyond.多中心临床前联盟,以促进创伤性脑损伤治疗方法和生物标志物的转化:脑创伤治疗行动及其他。
Front Neurol. 2018 Aug 7;9:640. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00640. eCollection 2018.
5
The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science.团队科学的科学:对科学合作的实证证据和研究差距的综述。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):532-548. doi: 10.1037/amp0000319.
6
Teamwork situated in multiteam systems: Key lessons learned and future opportunities.多团队系统中的团队合作:关键经验教训和未来机遇。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):390-406. doi: 10.1037/amp0000322.
7
Systematic Review of Gender Differences in Sepsis Management and Outcomes.脓毒症管理与预后中性别差异的系统评价
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017 May;49(3):312-324. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12295. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
8
Systematic review of gender- dependent outcomes in sepsis.脓毒症中性别相关结局的系统评价。
Nurs Crit Care. 2017 Sep;22(5):284-292. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12280. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
9
The next step in translational research: lessons learned from the first preclinical randomized controlled trial.转化研究的下一步:从首个临床前随机对照试验中吸取的经验教训。
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:271-279. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13516. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
10
Charting a course for collaboration: a multiteam perspective.绘制协作蓝图:多团队视角。
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec;2(4):487-94. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0170-3.