Marchesi Isabella, Ferranti Greta, Mansi Antonella, Marcelloni Anna M, Proietto Anna R, Saini Navneet, Borella Paola, Bargellini Annalisa
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neurosciences, Section of Public Health, Modena, Italy
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neurosciences, Section of Public Health, Modena, Italy.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 May 2;82(10):2959-2965. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03873-15. Print 2016 May 15.
Physical and chemical disinfection methods have been proposed with the aim of controlling Legionella water contamination. To date, the most effective procedures for reducing bacterial contamination have not yet been defined. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term effectiveness of various disinfection procedures in order to reduce both culturable and nonculturable (NC) legionellae in different hospital water networks treated with heat, chlorine dioxide, monochloramine, and hydrogen peroxide. The temperature levels and biocide concentrations that proved to give reliable results were analyzed. In order to study the possible effects on the water pipes, we verified the extent of corrosion on experimental coupons after applying each method for 6 months. The percentage of positive points was at its lowest after treatment with monochloramine, followed by chlorine dioxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hyperthermia. Different selections of Legionella spp. were observed, as networks treated with chlorine-based disinfectants were contaminated mainly by Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, hyperthermia was associated with serogroups 2 to 14, and hydrogen peroxide treatment was associated mainly with non-pneumophila species. NC cells were detected only in heat-treated waters, and also when the temperature was approximately 60°C. The corrosion rates of the coupons were within a satisfactory limit for water networks, but the morphologies differed. We confirm here that chemical disinfection controls Legionella colonization more effectively than hyperthermia does. Monochloramine was the most effective treatment, while hydrogen peroxide may be a promising alternative to chlorine-based disinfectants due to its ability to select for other, less virulent or nonpathogenic species.
为控制军团菌水污染,已提出了物理和化学消毒方法。迄今为止,尚未确定减少细菌污染的最有效程序。本研究的目的是评估各种消毒程序的长期有效性,以减少不同医院水网络中经加热、二氧化氯、一氯胺和过氧化氢处理后的可培养和不可培养(NC)军团菌。分析了证明能给出可靠结果的温度水平和杀菌剂浓度。为了研究对水管的可能影响,我们在每种方法应用6个月后,验证了实验试片上的腐蚀程度。用一氯胺处理后,阳性点的百分比最低,其次是二氧化氯、过氧化氢和高温处理。观察到不同的军团菌种类选择,因为用氯基消毒剂处理的水网络主要被嗜肺军团菌血清型1污染,高温处理与血清型2至14相关,而过氧化氢处理主要与非嗜肺菌种相关。仅在热处理的水中以及温度约为60°C时检测到NC细胞。试片的腐蚀速率在水网络的满意限度内,但形态不同。我们在此确认,化学消毒比高温处理更有效地控制军团菌定殖。一氯胺是最有效的处理方法,而过氧化氢由于能够选择其他毒性较小或无致病性的菌种,可能是氯基消毒剂的一种有前途的替代品。