• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项台式研究中使用自动充气式气囊压力计输送目标压力的准确性。

The accuracy of delivery of target pressures using self-inflating bag manometers in a benchtop study.

作者信息

Rafferty Anthony R, Johnson Lucy, Maxfield Dominic, Dawson Jennifer A, Davis Peter G, Thio Marta

机构信息

Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr. 2016 Jun;105(6):e247-51. doi: 10.1111/apa.13397.

DOI:10.1111/apa.13397
PMID:26970561
Abstract

AIM

We tested whether operators using manometers attached to self-inflating bags could accurately deliver set targeted peak inspiratory pressures (PIPs) compared to the Neopuff(™) T-piece resuscitator (TPR).

METHODS

Participants provided positive pressure ventilation to a leak-free neonatal test lung at a rate of 60 inflations/min and a flow of 8 L/min. Participants used three manometers attached to self-inflating bags and a Neopuff(™) TPR to target PIPs of 20, 30 and 40 cmH2 O on each device. Mean PIPs delivered with each manometer were compared to the 'gold standard' Neopuff(™) TPR.

RESULTS

In total, 13 991 inflations delivered by 20 participants were analysed. At all target PIPs, the mean PIP delivered using the Mercury Medical manometer attached to a Laerdal self-inflating bag was significantly higher by 5 cmH2 O (p < 0.01) than the Neopuff(™) TPR. The PIP delivered using both the Ambu(™) and Parker Healthcare manometers attached to their respective devices was similar to that delivered by the Neopuff(™) TPR at all targeted PIPs.

CONCLUSION

Accurately targeted PIPs can be achieved when a manometer specifically designed for use on a self-inflating bag is used during manual ventilation. This may be useful in settings where access to a Neopuff(™) TPR or a gas flow source is limited.

摘要

目的

我们测试了与Neopuff™ T型复苏器(TPR)相比,使用连接在自动充气式气囊上的压力计的操作人员能否准确输送设定的目标吸气峰压(PIP)。

方法

参与者以每分钟60次充气、8升/分钟的流速向无泄漏的新生儿测试肺提供正压通气。参与者使用连接在自动充气式气囊上的三种压力计和一台Neopuff™ TPR,在每个设备上设定目标PIP为20、30和40厘米水柱。将每个压力计输送的平均PIP与“金标准”Neopuff™ TPR进行比较。

结果

共分析了20名参与者进行的13991次充气。在所有目标PIP下,使用连接在Laerdal自动充气式气囊上的Mercury Medical压力计输送的平均PIP比Neopuff™ TPR显著高5厘米水柱(p < 0.01)。在所有目标PIP下,使用连接在各自设备上的Ambu™和Parker Healthcare压力计输送的PIP与Neopuff™ TPR输送的PIP相似。

结论

在手动通气期间,当使用专门设计用于自动充气式气囊的压力计时,可以实现准确的目标PIP。这在获得Neopuff™ TPR或气体流量源受限的情况下可能有用。

相似文献

1
The accuracy of delivery of target pressures using self-inflating bag manometers in a benchtop study.在一项台式研究中使用自动充气式气囊压力计输送目标压力的准确性。
Acta Paediatr. 2016 Jun;105(6):e247-51. doi: 10.1111/apa.13397.
2
A comparison of three neonatal resuscitation devices.三种新生儿复苏设备的比较。
Resuscitation. 2005 Oct;67(1):113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.02.016.
3
Can Ambu self-inflating bag and Neopuff infant resuscitator provide adequate and safe manual inflations for infants up to 10 kg weight?安布自动充气式气囊和纽普夫婴儿复苏器能否为体重达10千克的婴儿提供充足且安全的手动通气?
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Jul;102(4):F333-F338. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311830. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
4
Comparison of methods of bag and mask ventilation for neonatal resuscitation.新生儿复苏中气囊面罩通气方法的比较
Resuscitation. 2001 Jun;49(3):299-305. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(01)00311-2.
5
Neonatal resuscitation in resource-limited settings: titrating oxygen delivery without an oxygen blender.资源有限环境下的新生儿复苏:在没有氧气混合器的情况下滴定氧输送。
J Pediatr. 2014 Aug;165(2):256-260.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.04.020. Epub 2014 May 24.
6
Providing PEEP during neonatal resuscitation: which device is best?新生儿复苏期间提供呼气末正压通气:哪种设备最佳?
J Paediatr Child Health. 2011 Oct;47(10):698-703. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02036.x. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
7
Oxygen delivery using neonatal self-inflating bags without reservoirs.使用无储氧袋的新生儿自动充气式复苏气囊进行氧输送。
Pediatr Int. 2017 Feb;59(2):154-158. doi: 10.1111/ped.13184. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
8
Neopuff T-piece resuscitator: does device design affect delivered ventilation?Neopuff T型复苏器:设备设计会影响通气输送吗?
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 May;102(3):F220-F224. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311164. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
9
The effect of a PEEP valve on a Laerdal neonatal self-inflating resuscitation bag.呼气末正压阀对Laerdal新生儿自动充气式复苏气囊的影响。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2010 Jan;46(1-2):51-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01617.x. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
10
Artificial ventilation during transport: A randomized crossover study of manual resuscitators with comparison to mechanical ventilators in a simulation model.转运期间的人工通气:在模拟模型中对人工复苏器与机械通气机进行比较的随机交叉研究。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Sep;28(9):788-794. doi: 10.1111/pan.13389.

引用本文的文献

1
Respiratory metrics of neonatal positive pressure ventilation on different ventilatory rates: A simulation study.不同通气频率下新生儿正压通气的呼吸指标:一项模拟研究。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Dec 31;21:100860. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100860. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
T-Piece resuscitator versus self-inflating bag for delivery room resuscitation in preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial.T 型复苏器与自动充气式气囊用于早产儿产房复苏的随机对照试验。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Dec;182(12):5565-5576. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05230-7. Epub 2023 Oct 4.