Suppr超能文献

能否使用双深度多普勒技术在床边进行无创颅内压测量?

Can intracranial pressure be measured non-invasively bedside using a two-depth Doppler-technique?

作者信息

Koskinen Lars-Owe D, Malm Jan, Zakelis Rolandas, Bartusis Laimonas, Ragauskas Arminas, Eklund Anders

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurosurgery and Neurology, Umeå University, Umeå, 90185, Sweden.

Health Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Apr;31(2):459-467. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9862-4. Epub 2016 Mar 14.

Abstract

Measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP) is necessary in many neurological and neurosurgical diseases. To avoid lumbar puncture or intracranial ICP probes, non-invasive ICP techniques are becoming popular. A recently developed technology uses two-depth Doppler to compare arterial pulsations in the intra- and extra-cranial segments of the ophthalmic artery for non-invasive estimation of ICP. The aim of this study was to investigate how well non-invasively-measured ICP and invasively-measured cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure correlate. We performed multiple measurements over a wide ICP span in eighteen elderly patients with communicating hydrocephalus. As a reference, an automatic CSF infusion apparatus was connected to the lumbar space. Ringer's solution was used to create elevation to pre-defined ICP levels. Bench tests of the infusion apparatus showed a random error (95 % CI) of less than ±0.9 mmHg and a systematic error of less than ±0.5 mmHg. Reliable Doppler signals were obtained in 13 (72 %) patients. An infusion test could not be performed in one patient. Thus, twelve patients and a total of 61 paired data points were studied. The correlation between invasive and non-invasive ICP measurements was good (R = 0.74), and the 95 % limits of agreements were -1.4 ± 8.8 mmHg. The within-patient correlation varied between 0.47 and 1.00. This non-invasive technique is promising, and these results encourage further development and evaluation before the method can be recommended for use in clinical practice.

摘要

在许多神经科和神经外科疾病中,测量颅内压(ICP)是必要的。为避免腰椎穿刺或颅内ICP探头,非侵入性ICP技术正变得越来越流行。一种最近开发的技术使用双深度多普勒来比较眼动脉颅内段和颅外段的动脉搏动,以进行ICP的非侵入性估计。本研究的目的是调查非侵入性测量的ICP与侵入性测量的脑脊液(CSF)压力之间的相关性如何。我们对18例交通性脑积水老年患者在较宽的ICP范围内进行了多次测量。作为参考,将自动CSF输注装置连接到腰椎间隙。使用林格氏液将压力升高到预先定义的ICP水平。输注装置的台架测试显示随机误差(95%CI)小于±0.9mmHg,系统误差小于±0.5mmHg。13例(72%)患者获得了可靠的多普勒信号。1例患者无法进行输注试验。因此,对12例患者和总共61对数据点进行了研究。侵入性和非侵入性ICP测量之间的相关性良好(R = 0.74),95%一致性界限为-1.4±8.8mmHg。患者内相关性在0.47至1.00之间变化。这种非侵入性技术很有前景,这些结果鼓励在该方法被推荐用于临床实践之前进一步开展研发和评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验