Campos-Fumero Adriana, Delclos George L, Douphrate David I, Felknor Sarah A, Vargas-Prada Sergio, Serra Consol, Coggon David, Gimeno Ruiz de Porras David
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica, Cartago, Costa Rica.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA Center for Research in Occupational Health (CiSAL), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain.
Occup Environ Med. 2016 Jun;73(6):394-400. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103327. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
To estimate the prevalence and incidence of upper extremity musculoskeletal pain (UEMP) and related disability among office workers in Costa Rica, Nicaragua and Spain.
Data from the multinational Cultural and Psychosocial Influences on Disability (CUPID) study on 947 (93%) participants at baseline with 90% follow-up after 12 months were employed. Logistic regression was used to estimate the associations (ORs and corresponding 95% CIs) between country and six outcomes: baseline prevalence of (1) UEMP in past 12 months, (2) UEMP in past month and (3) disabling UEMP in past month; (4) incidence of new UEMP at follow-up; (5) incidence of new disabling UEMP at follow-up and (6) persistence of UEMP at follow-up, after adjustment for sociodemographic, job-related and health-related covariates.
Baseline prevalence of UEMP in the past month was higher in Costa Rica (53.6%) (OR=1.89; 95% CI 1.36 to 2.62) and Nicaragua (51.9%) (OR=1.74; 95% CI 1.28 to 2.35) than in Spain (38.4%). Compared to Spain (33.2%), the incidence of new UEMP was 50.4% in Costa Rica (OR=2.04; 95% CI 1.34 to 3.12) and 60.2% in Nicaragua (OR=3.04; 95% CI 2.06 to 4.50). The incidence of disabling UEMP was higher in Nicaragua (OR=2.57; 95% CI 1.50 to 4.41) and Costa Rica (OR=2.16; 95% CI 1.22 to 3.84) when compared to Spain.
Prevalence of UEMP was approximately twofold higher and its incidence twofold to threefold higher in Costa Rica and Nicaragua as compared with Spain. Between-country differences were only partially explained by the covariates analysed. Research is needed to explore other aspects of work and cultural attributes that might explain the residual differences in UEMP.
评估哥斯达黎加、尼加拉瓜和西班牙办公室职员上肢肌肉骨骼疼痛(UEMP)及其相关残疾的患病率和发病率。
采用多国文化和心理社会因素对残疾影响(CUPID)研究的数据,该研究纳入了947名(93%)基线参与者,12个月后随访率为90%。采用逻辑回归分析,在对社会人口学、工作相关和健康相关协变量进行调整后,估计国家与六个结局之间的关联(比值比及相应的95%置信区间),这六个结局分别为:(1)过去12个月UEMP的基线患病率;(2)过去一个月UEMP的患病率;(3)过去一个月导致残疾的UEMP患病率;(4)随访时新发UEMP的发病率;(5)随访时新发导致残疾的UEMP的发病率;(6)随访时UEMP的持续情况。
过去一个月UEMP的基线患病率在哥斯达黎加(53.6%)(比值比=1.89;95%置信区间1.36至2.62)和尼加拉瓜(51.9%)(比值比=1.74;95%置信区间1.28至2.35)高于西班牙(38.4%)。与西班牙(33.2%)相比,哥斯达黎加新发UEMP的发病率为50.4%(比值比=2.04;95%置信区间1.34至3.12),尼加拉瓜为60.2%(比值比=3.04;95%置信区间2.06至4.50)。与西班牙相比,尼加拉瓜(比值比=2.57;95%置信区间1.50至4.41)和哥斯达黎加(比值比=2.16;95%置信区间1.22至3.84)导致残疾的UEMP发病率更高。
与西班牙相比,哥斯达黎加和尼加拉瓜UEMP的患病率约高两倍,发病率高两倍至三倍。分析的协变量仅部分解释了国家间的差异。需要开展研究以探索工作和文化属性的其他方面,这些方面可能解释UEMP中剩余的差异。