Gao Z H, Hu L, Liu G L, Wei F L, Liu Y, Liu Z H, Fan Z P, Zhang C M, Wang J S, Wang S L
Molecular Laboratory for Gene Therapy and Tooth Regeneration, Beijing Key Laboratory of Tooth Regeneration and Function Reconstruction, Capital Medical University School of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
Department of Orthodontics, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine, School of Stomatology, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
J Dent Res. 2016 Jun;95(6):642-9. doi: 10.1177/0022034516639260. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
We previously reported that dental stem cell-mediated bioengineered tooth root (bio-root) regeneration could restore tooth loss in a miniature pig model. As a potential new method for tooth restoration, it is essential to compare this method with the widely used commercial dental implant-based method of tooth restoration. Tooth loss models were created by extracting mandibular incisors from miniature pigs. Allogeneic periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs) and dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) were isolated and cultured. A PDLSC sheet was prepared by adding 20.0 µg/mL vitamin C to the culture medium; in addition, a hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP)/DPSC graft was fabricated and cultured in a 3-dimensional culture system. A total of 46 bio-root implantations and 9 dental implants were inserted, and crown restorations were performed 6 mo after implantation. Histological, radiological, biomechanical, and elemental analyses were used to evaluate and compare tissue-engineered bio-roots and dental implants to the natural tooth roots. After 6 mo, both computed tomography scans and histological examinations showed that root-like structures and dentin-like tissues had formed. Three months after crown restoration, clinical assessments revealed that tooth function was equivalent in the regenerated bio-root and the dental implant. Biomechanical testing showed that the bio-roots were similar to natural tooth roots in compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, and torsional force; however, these properties were significantly higher in the dental implants. Elemental analysis revealed a higher similarity in elemental composition between bio-roots and natural tooth roots than between bio-roots and dental implants. However, the dental implant success rate was 100% (9 of 9) and the bio-root success rate was only 22% (10 of 46). Taken together, we showed that an allogeneic HA/TCP/DPSC/PDLSC sheet could successfully build a bio-root with structure and function similar to the natural tooth root; however, tissue engineering procedures must be optimized further to improve the success rate.
我们之前报道过,牙干细胞介导的生物工程牙根(生物牙根)再生能够在小型猪模型中修复牙齿缺失。作为一种潜在的牙齿修复新方法,将此方法与广泛使用的基于商业牙种植体的牙齿修复方法进行比较至关重要。通过拔除小型猪的下颌切牙创建牙齿缺失模型。分离并培养异体牙周膜干细胞(PDLSCs)和牙髓干细胞(DPSCs)。通过向培养基中添加20.0μg/mL维生素C制备PDLSC片;此外,制备羟基磷灰石磷酸三钙(HA/TCP)/DPSC移植物并在三维培养系统中培养。共植入46个生物牙根和9个牙种植体,并在植入后6个月进行冠修复。使用组织学、放射学、生物力学和元素分析来评估和比较组织工程生物牙根和牙种植体与天然牙根。6个月后,计算机断层扫描和组织学检查均显示形成了根样结构和牙本质样组织。冠修复3个月后,临床评估显示再生生物牙根和牙种植体的牙齿功能相当。生物力学测试表明,生物牙根在抗压强度、弹性模量和扭转力方面与天然牙根相似;然而,这些特性在牙种植体中明显更高。元素分析显示,生物牙根与天然牙根之间的元素组成相似性高于生物牙根与牙种植体之间。然而,牙种植体的成功率为100%(9/9),而生物牙根的成功率仅为22%(46/10)。综上所述,我们表明异体HA/TCP/DPSC/PDLSC片能够成功构建具有与天然牙根相似结构和功能的生物牙根;然而,组织工程程序必须进一步优化以提高成功率。