• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妊娠期糖尿病女性的分娩时机与妊娠结局

Timing of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes.

作者信息

Feghali Maisa N, Caritis Steve N, Catov Janet M, Scifres Christina M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):243.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.006
PMID:26976558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4967397/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) commonly undergo induction of labor (IOL) at term, but the risks and benefits of IOL are incompletely understood.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the relationship among gestational age, IOL, and the rate of cesarean delivery (CD) in women with GDM.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified 863 women with GDM who underwent either IOL or spontaneous labor ≥37 0/7 weeks. Demographic, cervical favorability, and outcome data were abstracted from the medical record. We compared the CD rate in women undergoing IOL at each week of gestation with expectant management to a later gestational age.

RESULTS

When compared to women who were expectantly managed, IOL at 37 weeks (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-3.06; P = .23), 38 weeks (aOR, 2.07; 95% CI, 0.89-4.80; P = .09), and 39 weeks (aOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.44-1.42; P = .43)) was associated with similar risk for CD as expectant management after adjustment for nulliparity, body mass index, baseline simplified Bishop score, and maternal age. CD rates were higher in nulliparous women, but did not differ significantly in those undergoing IOL or expectant management. In multiparous women, IOL was significantly associated with an increased risk for CD at 38 weeks (aOR, 7.47; 95% CI, 1.6-34.8; P = .01) and rates of CD (17.39% vs 2.2%, P = .001) were significantly higher in multiparous women with an unfavorable Bishop score induced <39 weeks. Neonatal morbidity was similar across gestational ages after adjustment for maternal body mass index and maternal glycemic control.

CONCLUSION

IOL results in similar risk for CD as expectant management between 37-40 weeks of gestation. Rates of CD differed based on cervical exam and parity. These findings suggest that gestational age alone does not significantly impact maternal and neonatal outcomes, but that decisions regarding delivery in women with GDM should take into account cervical exam and parity.

摘要

背景

妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)女性通常在足月时接受引产(IOL),但IOL的风险和益处尚未完全明确。

目的

我们研究了GDM女性的孕周、IOL与剖宫产(CD)率之间的关系。

研究设计

我们确定了863例孕周≥37 0/7周且接受IOL或自然分娩的GDM女性。从病历中提取人口统计学、宫颈条件及结局数据。我们将各孕周接受IOL的女性与期待治疗至较晚孕周的女性的CD率进行比较。

结果

与接受期待治疗的女性相比,37周时IOL(校正优势比[aOR],1.53;95%置信区间[CI],0.76 - 3.06;P = 0.23)、38周时IOL(aOR,2.07;95% CI,0.89 - 4.80;P = 0.09)和39周时IOL(aOR,0.79;95% CI,0.44 - 1.42;P = 0.43)在调整初产情况、体重指数、基线简化Bishop评分和产妇年龄后,与期待治疗的CD风险相似。初产妇的CD率较高,但接受IOL或期待治疗的初产妇之间无显著差异。经产妇中,38周时IOL与CD风险增加显著相关(aOR,7.47;95% CI,1.6 - 34.8;P = 0.01),Bishop评分不佳且在<39周引产的经产妇CD率(17.39%对2.2%,P = 0.001)显著更高。在调整产妇体重指数和血糖控制后,各孕周的新生儿发病率相似。

结论

在妊娠37 - 40周之间,IOL导致的CD风险与期待治疗相似。CD率因宫颈检查和产次而异。这些发现表明,仅孕周本身不会显著影响母体和新生儿结局,但GDM女性的分娩决策应考虑宫颈检查和产次。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3fc/4967397/5305a9284b82/nihms768237f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3fc/4967397/a1244b306f30/nihms768237f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3fc/4967397/5305a9284b82/nihms768237f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3fc/4967397/a1244b306f30/nihms768237f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3fc/4967397/5305a9284b82/nihms768237f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Timing of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes.妊娠期糖尿病女性的分娩时机与妊娠结局
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):243.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
2
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
3
Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.在患有妊娠期糖尿病的女性中,在 40 周之前引产与剖宫产率降低有关。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):364.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.021.
4
Delivery timing and cesarean delivery risk in women with mild gestational diabetes mellitus.轻度妊娠期糖尿病女性的分娩时机与剖宫产风险
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;211(3):244.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
5
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.足月选择性引产的母婴结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
6
Timing of induction of labor in suspected macrosomia: retrospective cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis.疑似巨大儿引产的时机:回顾性队列研究、系统评价和荟萃分析
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;64(4):443-452. doi: 10.1002/uog.27643.
7
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with gestational diabetes and without specific medical conditions: an Australian population-based study comparing induction of labor with expectant management.患有妊娠期糖尿病且无特定医疗条件的女性的母婴结局:一项澳大利亚基于人群的研究,比较了引产与期待管理。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Aug;62(4):525-535. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13505. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
8
Outcomes among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Nonmedically Indicated Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management Differ by Maternal Age.39 周时无医学指征行引产与期待治疗相比,产妇年龄不同对母婴结局的影响也不同。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e1061-e1068. doi: 10.1055/a-1990-8411. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
9
Induction of labor versus expectant management for gestational diabetes mellitus at term.对于足月妊娠期糖尿病,引产与期待治疗的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jul;300(1):79-86. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05171-3. Epub 2019 May 7.
10
Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.病态肥胖女性的非医学指征引产与剖宫产风险增加无关。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):451.e1-451.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.048. Epub 2017 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Affecting Mode of Birth in Women With Preexisting Diabetes and Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort at a Tertiary Referral Center.影响患有糖尿病前期和妊娠期糖尿病妇女分娩方式的因素:一家三级转诊中心的回顾性队列研究。
J Diabetes Res. 2024 May 31;2024:5561761. doi: 10.1155/2024/5561761. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes between induction and expectant management among women with gestational diabetes mellitus at term pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较妊娠期糖尿病足月孕妇引产与期待管理的母婴不良结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jul 12;23(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05779-z.
3
Outcomes of Childbirth Education for Women With Pregnancy Complications.妊娠并发症妇女分娩教育的结果
J Perinat Educ. 2023 May 1;32(2):94-103. doi: 10.1891/JPE-2022-0006.
4
Gestational diabetes mellitus: The optimal time of delivery.妊娠期糖尿病:最佳分娩时间
World J Diabetes. 2023 Mar 15;14(3):179-187. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i3.179.
5
Establishing the Optimal Time for Induction of Labor in Women with Diet-Controlled Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Observational Study.确定饮食控制的妊娠期糖尿病妇女引产的最佳时机:一项单中心观察性研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 29;11(21):6410. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216410.
6
Metabolic profiling of pre-gestational and gestational diabetes mellitus identifies novel predictors of pre-term delivery.孕前和妊娠期糖尿病的代谢谱分析确定了早产的新预测指标。
J Transl Med. 2020 Sep 24;18(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02531-5.
7
A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour.系统评价分娩诱导的临床指征。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0228196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228196. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial.大胎儿引产与期待管理的随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 27;385(9987):2600-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61904-8. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
2
Nonmedically indicated induction vs expectant treatment in term nulliparous women.足月未产妇非医学指征引产与期待治疗的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;212(1):103.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.054. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
3
What is the optimal gestational age for women with gestational diabetes type A1 to deliver?A1型妊娠期糖尿病女性的最佳分娩孕周是多少?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;211(4):418.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.015. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
4
Delivery timing and cesarean delivery risk in women with mild gestational diabetes mellitus.轻度妊娠期糖尿病女性的分娩时机与剖宫产风险
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;211(3):244.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
5
Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes.选择性足月引产与期待管理的比较:母婴结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):761-769. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a6a4d0.
6
Practice Bulletin No. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus.实践通报第 137 号:妊娠期糖尿病。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 1):406-416. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000433006.09219.f1.
7
Should cervical favourability play a role in the decision for labour induction in gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia at term? An exploratory analysis of the HYPITAT trial.宫颈成熟度在足月妊娠合并高血压或轻度子痫前期行引产中的作用?HYPITAT 试验的探索性分析。
BJOG. 2012 Aug;119(9):1123-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03405.x. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
8
Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.引产以改善足月及过期妊娠妇女的分娩结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;6(6):CD004945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub3.
9
Births: final data for 2009.出生情况:2009年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011 Nov 3;60(1):1-70.
10
Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth.指征性晚期早产儿和早期足月儿的分娩时机。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;118(2 Pt 1):323-333. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182255999.