Suppr超能文献

报告透明度:明确道德要求。

Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit.

作者信息

Nicholls Stuart G, Langan Sinéad M, Benchimol Eric I, Moher David

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, c/o RI Administration Offices, Research Building 1, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada.

School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2016 Mar 16;14:44. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0587-5.

Abstract

Improving the transparency and quality of reporting in biomedical research is considered ethically important; yet, this is often based on practical reasons such as the facilitation of peer review. Surprisingly, there has been little explicit discussion regarding the ethical obligations that underpin reporting guidelines. In this commentary, we suggest a number of ethical drivers for the improved reporting of research. These ethical drivers relate to researcher integrity as well as to the benefits derived from improved reporting such as the fair use of resources, minimizing risk of harms, and maximizing benefits. Despite their undoubted benefit to reporting completeness, questions remain regarding the extent to which reporting guidelines can influence processes beyond publication, including researcher integrity or the uptake of scientific research findings into policy or practice. Thus, we consider investigation on the effects of reporting guidelines an important step in providing evidence of their benefits.

摘要

提高生物医学研究报告的透明度和质量在伦理上被认为是重要的;然而,这往往基于诸如便于同行评审等实际原因。令人惊讶的是,对于支撑报告指南的伦理义务,几乎没有明确的讨论。在这篇评论中,我们提出了一些促进改进研究报告的伦理驱动因素。这些伦理驱动因素涉及研究人员的诚信,以及改进报告所带来的益处,如资源的合理使用、将危害风险降至最低和利益最大化。尽管报告指南对报告完整性有无疑的益处,但对于报告指南能够在多大程度上影响出版之外的过程,包括研究人员的诚信或科研成果在政策或实践中的应用,仍存在疑问。因此,我们认为对报告指南的效果进行调查是提供其益处证据的重要一步。

相似文献

2
Publication ethics.出版伦理
Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 Oct;19(10):1011-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03086.x. Epub 2009 Jun 13.
8
Responsible research publication: international standards for editors.负责任的研究发表:编辑的国际标准
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2014;35(3):35-41. doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2015-0006.
10
Maintaining Research and Publication Integrity.维护研究与出版的诚信。
Clin Chem. 2019 Feb;65(2):230-235. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.298901. Epub 2018 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Ethical challenges of big data in public health.公共卫生领域大数据的伦理挑战。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Feb 9;11(2):e1003904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003904. eCollection 2015 Feb.
4
The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble.研究的社会许可:为何care.data陷入困境。
J Med Ethics. 2015 May;41(5):404-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102374. Epub 2015 Jan 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验