Toprak Şükrü Salih, Gültekin Yücel, Okuş Ahmet
Clinic of General Surgery, Konya Beyhekim State Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
Department of Intensive Care, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2015 Aug 18;32(1):18-22. doi: 10.5152/UCD.2015.2991. eCollection 2016.
Various different surgical methods are used for obesity surgery. Among them, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic gastric plication (LGP) have been both successfully performed in recent years. In this study, we compared the treatment results of patients who underwent LGP, a method that was introduced later consisting of plication of gastric greater curvature to achieve volume reduction, with results of patients who underwent LSG.
We analyzed data on morbid obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery with either LSG or LPG in Konya Beyhekim Hospital between 2009 and 2012. Demographic features including age and sex, preoperative blood biochemistry, body mass index (BMI) before and after operation, duration of hospital stay, morbidity, mortality and complications were analyzed.
Fifty-five patients who were operated for obesity between 2009 and 2012 were included in the study. 29 patients underwent LGP, and 26 patients LSG. The BMI in the LGP and LSG groups was 41.4±3 kg/m(2) and 42.0±3.1 kg/m(2), respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of BMI. Two groups were also similar in terms of age and gender. In the LGP group, one patient had postoperative necrosis of the suture line. One patient in the LSG group was re-operated due to bleeding. Another patient in this group had leakage at the suture line. Postoperative BMI assessment of groups revealed significantly lower BMI levels in the LSG group. Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LGP group. There was no significant difference in complication rates between two groups.
In this study, we obtained similar results in patients who were treated with LGP or LSG. Moreover, LSG was more efficient in decreasing BMI in morbid obesity surgery when compared to LGP. However, duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter in LGP group. We concluded that both methods could be effectively and safely used in the surgical management of morbid obesity.
肥胖症手术采用了各种不同的手术方法。其中,腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)和腹腔镜胃折叠术(LGP)近年来均已成功实施。在本研究中,我们将接受LGP(一种后来引入的通过折叠胃大弯来实现容积减小的方法)治疗的患者的治疗结果与接受LSG治疗的患者的结果进行了比较。
我们分析了2009年至2012年在科尼亚贝希克姆医院接受LSG或LPG减肥手术的病态肥胖患者的数据。分析了包括年龄和性别在内的人口统计学特征、术前血液生化指标、手术前后的体重指数(BMI)、住院时间、发病率、死亡率和并发症。
2009年至2012年期间接受肥胖症手术的55例患者纳入本研究。29例患者接受LGP手术,26例患者接受LSG手术。LGP组和LSG组的BMI分别为41.4±3kg/m²和42.0±3.1kg/m²。两组在BMI方面无显著差异。两组在年龄和性别方面也相似。LGP组有1例患者术后出现缝线坏死。LSG组有1例患者因出血接受再次手术。该组另1例患者出现缝线处渗漏。两组术后BMI评估显示LSG组的BMI水平显著更低。LGP组的住院时间显著更短。两组并发症发生率无显著差异。
在本研究中,我们在接受LGP或LSG治疗的患者中获得了相似的结果。此外,与LGP相比,LSG在病态肥胖症手术中降低BMI方面更有效。然而,LGP组的住院时间显著更短。我们得出结论,两种方法均可有效且安全地用于病态肥胖症的手术治疗。