• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of induced versus non-induced labor in post-term pregnancy. A randomized prospective study.

作者信息

Bergsjø P, Huang G D, Yu S Q, Gao Z Z, Bakketeig L S

机构信息

Hubei Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989;68(8):683-7. doi: 10.3109/00016348909006139.

DOI:10.3109/00016348909006139
PMID:2698591
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the proper management of pregnancy in uncomplicated cases going beyond 42 weeks.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial of induction of labor at or shortly after the 42-week limit, versus close monitoring without induction except when indicated for medical reasons.

SETTING

Hospital's obstetrical department

STUDY POPULATION

188 pregnant women, randomly allocated to two groups with 94 in each.

INTERVENTIONS

Induction of labor by stripping of membranes and i.v. oxytocin infusion, with artificial rupture of membranes when the cervical opening was 3 cm or more in diameter. The control group was followed with clinical, biochemical and electronic tests, intervention being applied according to needs.

END POINTS

Frequency and modes of operative delivery, maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality.

MAIN RESULTS

The distribution of gestational age (in weeks) at birth was almost identical in the two groups, but there were more operative deliveries in the control group than in the induction group (64 versus 48, p less than 0.05). Maternal complications and perinatal morbidity rates were equally distributed between the groups. There was one perinatal death in the induction group and two deaths among the controls.

CONCLUSION

With due reservation for small numbers, routine induction after term may result in fewer operative deliveries. No other advantage has been demonstrated when compared with close monitoring and intervention when medically indicated.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of induced versus non-induced labor in post-term pregnancy. A randomized prospective study.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989;68(8):683-7. doi: 10.3109/00016348909006139.
2
Prolonged and post-term pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).过期妊娠和延长妊娠:法国妇产科医生学院(CNGOF)的临床实践指南。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jul;169(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.01.026. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
3
Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The Canadian Multicenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group.过期妊娠中引产与系列产前监测的比较:一项随机对照试验。加拿大多中心过期妊娠试验组
N Engl J Med. 1992 Jun 11;326(24):1587-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199206113262402.
4
A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in postterm pregnancy. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units.过期妊娠引产与期待治疗的临床试验。美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所母胎医学单位网络。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Mar;170(3):716-23.
5
Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.过期妊娠引产或系列产前胎儿监测:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;109(3):609-17. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000255665.77009.94.
6
Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial.41 周引产与 42 周期待管理(INDEX):多中心、随机非劣效性试验。
BMJ. 2019 Feb 20;364:l344. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l344.
7
Post-term pregnancy. I.过期妊娠。一。
Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Oct;56(4):467-70.
8
Serial antenatal monitoring compared with labor induction in post-term pregnancies.过期妊娠中连续产前监测与引产的比较
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995 Sep;74(8):599-603. doi: 10.3109/00016349509013469.
9
Induction versus expectant management in premature rupture of the membranes with mature amniotic fluid at 32 to 36 weeks: a randomized trial.32至36周胎膜早破且羊水成熟时引产与期待治疗的随机试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;169(4):775-82. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90004-3.
10
[Prolonged pregnancy. Labor induction versus intensified monitoring].[过期妊娠。引产与强化监测]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1998 Sep 28;160(40):5786-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.妊娠37周及以后引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 15;7(7):CD004945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub5.
2
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.人工破膜引产
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.pub3.
3
A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour.系统评价分娩诱导的临床指征。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0228196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228196. eCollection 2020.
4
Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.引产以改善足月及过期妊娠女性的分娩结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD004945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub4.
5
Caesarean Delivery Rate Review: An Evidence-Based Analysis.剖宫产率回顾:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2015 Mar 1;15(9):1-58. eCollection 2015.
6
Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.引产的使用与剖宫产风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2014 Jun 10;186(9):665-73. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130925. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
7
Postterm pregnancy.过期妊娠
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2012;4(3):175-87.
8
Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.引产以改善足月及过期妊娠妇女的分娩结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;6(6):CD004945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub3.
9
Elective induction for pregnancies at or beyond 41 weeks of gestation and its impact on stillbirths: a systematic review with meta-analysis.选择性诱导妊娠 41 周及以上及其对死胎的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 13;11 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S5.
10
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.人工破膜引产
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.pub2.