Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, 16000, Indonesia.
Lancaster Environment Centre, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK.
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jul;22(7):2540-54. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13284. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
Poverty, food insecurity, climate change and biodiversity loss continue to persist as the primary environmental and social challenges faced by the global community. As such, there is a growing acknowledgement that conventional sectorial approaches to addressing often inter-connected social, environmental, economic and political challenges are proving insufficient. An alternative is to focus on integrated solutions at landscape scales or 'landscape approaches'. The appeal of landscape approaches has resulted in the production of a significant body of literature in recent decades, yet confusion over terminology, application and utility persists. Focusing on the tropics, we systematically reviewed the literature to: (i) disentangle the historical development and theory behind the framework of the landscape approach and how it has progressed into its current iteration, (ii) establish lessons learned from previous land management strategies, (iii) determine the barriers that currently restrict implementation of the landscape approach and (iv) provide recommendations for how the landscape approach can contribute towards the fulfilment of the goals of international policy processes. This review suggests that, despite some barriers to implementation, a landscape approach has considerable potential to meet social and environmental objectives at local scales while aiding national commitments to addressing ongoing global challenges.
贫困、粮食不安全、气候变化和生物多样性丧失仍然是全球社会面临的主要环境和社会挑战。因此,人们越来越认识到,传统的部门方法在解决经常相互关联的社会、环境、经济和政治挑战方面证明是不够的。另一种方法是关注景观规模或“景观方法”的综合解决方案。景观方法的吸引力导致近几十年来产生了大量文献,但术语、应用和实用性方面的混淆仍然存在。本文以热带地区为重点,系统地回顾了文献,以:(i)理清景观方法框架的历史发展和理论,以及它如何发展到当前的迭代,(ii)从以前的土地管理策略中吸取经验教训,(iii)确定目前限制景观方法实施的障碍,以及(iv)为景观方法如何有助于实现国际政策进程的目标提供建议。这一审查表明,尽管实施方面存在一些障碍,但景观方法在地方一级实现社会和环境目标方面具有相当大的潜力,同时有助于国家承诺应对当前的全球挑战。