Department of Geography, Planning and International Development Studies and Centre for Sustainable Development Studies, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 15629, Amsterdam, 1001 NC, The Netherlands.
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Jalan CIFOR, Situ Gede,, Bogor, West Java, 16115, Indonesia.
Environ Manage. 2018 Jul;62(1):82-97. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0866-8. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
In recognition of the failures of sectoral approaches to overcome global challenges of biodiversity loss, climate change, food insecurity and poverty, scientific discourse on biodiversity conservation and sustainable development is shifting towards integrated landscape governance arrangements. Current landscape initiatives however very much depend on external actors and funding, raising the question of whether, and how, and under what conditions, locally embedded resource management schemes can serve as entry points for the implementation of integrated landscape approaches. This paper assesses the entry point potential for three established natural resource management schemes in West Africa that target landscape degradation with involvement of local communities: the Chantier d'Aménagement Forestier scheme encompassing forest management sites across Burkina Faso and the Modified Taungya System and community wildlife resource management initiatives in Ghana. Based on a review of the current literature, we analyze the extent to which design principles that define a landscape approach apply to these schemes. We found that the CREMA meets most of the desired criteria, but that its scale may be too limited to guarantee effective landscape governance, hence requiring upscaling. Conversely, the other two initiatives are strongly lacking in their design principles on fundamental components regarding integrated approaches, continual learning, and capacity building. Monitoring and evaluation bodies and participatory learning and negotiation platforms could enhance the schemes' alignment with integrated landscape approaches.
为了应对生物多样性丧失、气候变化、粮食不安全和贫困等全球性挑战,部门方法的失败,生物多样性保护和可持续发展的科学论述正在转向综合景观治理安排。然而,当前的景观倡议在很大程度上依赖于外部行为者和资金,这引发了一个问题,即地方嵌入的资源管理计划在何种条件下可以作为实施综合景观方法的切入点,以及它们是否可以作为切入点。本文评估了西非三个针对景观退化并涉及当地社区的既定自然资源管理计划作为切入点的潜力:布基纳法索各地森林管理点的森林管理计划(Chantier d'Aménagement Forestier)、改良刀耕火种系统和加纳的社区野生动物资源管理倡议。基于对现有文献的回顾,我们分析了定义景观方法的设计原则在多大程度上适用于这些计划。我们发现,CREMA 满足了大多数理想的标准,但它的规模可能太小,无法保证有效的景观治理,因此需要扩大规模。相反,其他两个倡议在综合方法、持续学习和能力建设等基本组成部分的设计原则上严重缺失。监测和评估机构以及参与式学习和谈判平台可以增强这些计划与综合景观方法的一致性。