• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加纳北部利益相关者对景观治理的看法:一项 Q 研究,以确定综合景观方法的共同关注切入点。

Stakeholder Perceptions on Landscape Governance in Northern Ghana: A Q-Study to Identify Common Concern Entry Points for Integrated Landscape Approaches.

机构信息

Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR) / Department of Geography, Planning and International Development Studies, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;74(1):31-51. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01881-2. Epub 2023 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-023-01881-2
PMID:37777599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11208230/
Abstract

In a landscape, perceptions can influence people's actions and behavior toward natural resource use. Improving landscape governance, therefore, requires understanding the different concerns of stakeholders operating within the landscape. This paper analyzes the perceptions of local stakeholders-local landscape users, practitioners engaged in conservation and sustainable resource use, and private actors-regarding the landscape governance system, using the Q-methodology to identify common concern entry points for the implementation of a landscape approach in the Western Wildlife Corridor (WWC) in northern Ghana. To this end, individual interviews and focus groups were conducted with local communities and organizations operating in three Community Resource Management Areas (CREMAs). They identified destructive livelihood activities, constrained livelihoods, and a weak governance system as the main challenges, and the need to balance livelihoods with conservation, strengthening landscape governance through the CREMA initiative, and awareness raising as the main solutions. Thus, the Q-method allowed identifying common concern entry points regarding landscape challenges, governance issues, and potential solutions. I argue that consensus among stakeholders regarding these challenges and solutions could lay the groundwork for a multi-stakeholder process in the area, which could help foster the implementation of an integrated landscape approach in the WWC landscape. It is crucial to support the livelihoods of local people to reduce pressures on natural resources. It is also important to strengthen the functioning of local CREMA management bodies with technical, logistical, and financial support. Implementing a participatory monitoring and evaluation mechanism is critical in this regard.

摘要

在景观中,人们的看法会影响他们对自然资源利用的行为。因此,改善景观治理需要了解在景观中运作的利益相关者的不同关注点。本文使用 Q 方法分析了当地利益相关者(当地景观使用者、从事保护和可持续资源利用的从业者以及私营部门参与者)对景观治理系统的看法,目的是确定在加纳北部西部野生动物走廊(WWC)实施景观方法的共同关注点。为此,在三个社区资源管理区(CREMA)中对当地社区和组织进行了个人访谈和焦点小组讨论。他们认为破坏生计活动、受限制的生计和薄弱的治理系统是主要挑战,需要平衡生计与保护,通过 CREMA 倡议加强景观治理,并提高认识。因此,Q 方法允许确定景观挑战、治理问题和潜在解决方案的共同关注点。我认为,利益相关者对这些挑战和解决方案的共识可以为该地区的多方利益相关者进程奠定基础,这有助于促进 WWC 景观中综合景观方法的实施。支持当地人民的生计以减少对自然资源的压力至关重要。还需要通过技术、后勤和财务支持来加强当地 CREMA 管理机构的运作。在这方面,实施参与式监测和评估机制至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fe/11208230/9cc146248400/267_2023_1881_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fe/11208230/986780c15856/267_2023_1881_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fe/11208230/9cc146248400/267_2023_1881_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fe/11208230/986780c15856/267_2023_1881_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fe/11208230/9cc146248400/267_2023_1881_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Stakeholder Perceptions on Landscape Governance in Northern Ghana: A Q-Study to Identify Common Concern Entry Points for Integrated Landscape Approaches.加纳北部利益相关者对景观治理的看法:一项 Q 研究,以确定综合景观方法的共同关注切入点。
Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;74(1):31-51. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01881-2. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
2
Natural Resource Management Schemes as Entry Points for Integrated Landscape Approaches: Evidence from Ghana and Burkina Faso.自然资源管理计划作为综合景观方法的切入点:来自加纳和布基纳法索的证据。
Environ Manage. 2018 Jul;62(1):82-97. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0866-8. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
3
The Role of Multistakeholder Platforms in Environmental Governance: Analyzing Stakeholder Perceptions in Kalomo District, Zambia, Using Q-Method.多利益相关方平台在环境治理中的作用:使用质方法分析赞比亚卡洛莫区的利益相关者感知
Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;74(1):13-30. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01806-z. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
4
Perceptions from non-governmental actors on forest and landscape restoration, challenges and strategies for successful implementation across Asia, Africa and Latin America.非政府行为体对森林和景观恢复的看法、亚洲、非洲和拉丁美洲成功实施的挑战和战略。
J Environ Manage. 2021 May 15;286:112251. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112251. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
5
Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives.参与式规划、监测和评估综合景观倡议中的多方利益攸关者平台。
Environ Manage. 2018 Jul;62(1):170-181. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0847-y. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
6
Actor Perceptions of the Governance Framework and Non-Carbon Benefits from the Ghana Cocoa Forest REDD+ Program: An Extended Q-Study of the Juabuso-Bia Hotspot Intervention Area.演员对加纳可可林 REDD+ 计划的治理框架和非碳效益的看法:对朱阿布索-比亚热点干预区的扩展 Q 研究。
Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;74(1):73-93. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01978-2. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
7
The prospects of community-based natural resource management in Ghana: A case study of Zukpiri community resource management area.加纳基于社区的自然资源管理前景:以祖克里社区资源管理区为例
Heliyon. 2021 Oct 15;7(10):e08187. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08187. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
From Synergy to Complexity: The Trend Toward Integrated Value Chain and Landscape Governance.从协同到复杂性:走向综合价值链和景观治理的趋势。
Environ Manage. 2018 Jul;62(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1055-0. Epub 2018 May 30.
9
Religion and perceptions of community-based conservation in Ghana, West Africa.宗教与西非加纳的社区保护认知。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195498. eCollection 2018.
10
Co-producing theory of change to operationalize integrated landscape approaches.共同制定变革理论以实施综合景观方法。
Sustain Sci. 2023;18(2):839-855. doi: 10.1007/s11625-022-01190-3. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing CREMAs' Capacity to Govern Landscape Resources in the Western Wildlife Corridor of Northern Ghana.评估CREMAs在加纳北部西部野生动物走廊管理景观资源的能力。
Environ Manage. 2025 May;75(5):1055-1070. doi: 10.1007/s00267-025-02155-9. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
2
Institutional Design of Forest Landscape Restoration in Central Togo: Informing Policy-making through Q Methodology Analysis.多哥中部森林景观恢复的制度设计:通过Q方法分析为政策制定提供信息
Environ Manage. 2025 May;75(5):1239-1256. doi: 10.1007/s00267-025-02137-x. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
3
Making Landscapes Negotiable: Q-methodology as a Boundary-Spanning and Empowering Diagnostic.

本文引用的文献

1
The prospects of community-based natural resource management in Ghana: A case study of Zukpiri community resource management area.加纳基于社区的自然资源管理前景:以祖克里社区资源管理区为例
Heliyon. 2021 Oct 15;7(10):e08187. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08187. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Discourses mapped by Q-method show governance constraints motivate landscape approaches in Indonesia.Q 方法分析的话语表明,印度尼西亚的景观方法受到治理约束的驱动。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 31;14(1):e0211221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211221. eCollection 2019.
3
The future of hyperdiverse tropical ecosystems.
使景观具有可协商性:Q 方法论作为一种跨越边界和赋权的诊断方法。
Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;74(1):4-12. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-02004-1. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
4
Actor Perceptions of the Governance Framework and Non-Carbon Benefits from the Ghana Cocoa Forest REDD+ Program: An Extended Q-Study of the Juabuso-Bia Hotspot Intervention Area.演员对加纳可可林 REDD+ 计划的治理框架和非碳效益的看法:对朱阿布索-比亚热点干预区的扩展 Q 研究。
Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;74(1):73-93. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01978-2. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
热带超多样性生态系统的未来。
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7715):517-526. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0301-1. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
4
When and how to use Q methodology to understand perspectives in conservation research.何时以及如何使用 Q 方法论来理解保护研究中的观点。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Oct;32(5):1185-1194. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13123. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
5
Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation.相关系数:合理使用与解释。
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.
6
Publishing social science research in Conservation Biology to move beyond biology.在《保护生物学》上发表社会科学研究,以超越生物学范畴。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Feb;32(1):6-8. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13059.
7
Natural Resource Management Schemes as Entry Points for Integrated Landscape Approaches: Evidence from Ghana and Burkina Faso.自然资源管理计划作为综合景观方法的切入点:来自加纳和布基纳法索的证据。
Environ Manage. 2018 Jul;62(1):82-97. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0866-8. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
8
Mapping discourses using Q methodology in Matang Mangrove Forest, Malaysia.运用Q方法对马来西亚马当红树林的话语进行映射分析。
J Environ Manage. 2016 Dec 1;183(Pt 3):988-997. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.046. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: learning from the past to guide the future.综合景观方法在热带地区管理社会和环境问题方面的应用:从过去的经验中学习,以指导未来。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jul;22(7):2540-54. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13284. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
10
Bootstrapping Q Methodology to Improve the Understanding of Human Perspectives.采用自举法的Q方法以增进对人类观点的理解。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 4;11(2):e0148087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148087. eCollection 2016.