Forwith Keith D, Han Joseph K, Stolovitzky J Pablo, Yen David M, Chandra Rakesh K, Karanfilov Boris, Matheny Keith E, Stambaugh James W, Gawlicka Anna K
Advanced ENT and Allergy, Louisville, KY.
Divisions of Rhinology and Endoscopic Sinus-Skull Base Surgery and Allergy, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Jun;6(6):573-81. doi: 10.1002/alr.21741. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
Patients with recurrent sinonasal polyposis after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) have limited treatment options. Safety and efficacy were previously reported for a bioabsorbable sinus implant that elutes mometasone furoate for 3 months. Here we summarize longer-term outcomes.
A randomized, controlled, blinded study with 100 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) patients who failed medical treatment and were considered candidates for revision ESS. Treated patients (n = 57) underwent in-office implant placement. Control patients (n = 43) underwent a sham procedure. Endoscopic grading at 3 months by clinicians was corroborated by an independent review of randomized videoendoscopies by a panel of 3 sinus surgeons. Six-month follow-up included endoscopic grading and patient-reported outcomes.
At 6 months, treated patients experienced significant improvement in Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score (p = 0.021) and >2-fold improvement in mean nasal obstruction/congestion score (-1.06 ± 1.4 vs -0.44 ± 1.4; p = 0.124). Endoscopically, treated patients experienced significant reduction in ethmoid sinus obstruction (p < 0.001) and bilateral polyp grade (p = 0.018) compared to controls. Panel review confirmed a significant reduction in ethmoid sinus obstruction (p = 0.010) and 2-fold improvement in bilateral polyp grade (p = 0.099), which reached statistical significance (p = 0.049) in a subset of 67 patients with baseline polyp burden ≥2 bilaterally. At 6 months, control patients were at 3.6 times higher risk of remaining indicated for ESS than treated patients.
The symptomatic and endoscopic improvements observed confirm the efficacy of the steroid-eluting implant for in-office treatment of CRSwNP after ESS. These longer-term 6-month study results demonstrate that the steroid-eluting implant represents a durable, safe, and effective treatment strategy for this patient population.
内镜鼻窦手术(ESS)后复发性鼻息肉患者的治疗选择有限。先前报道了一种可生物吸收的鼻窦植入物,其可释放糠酸莫米松3个月,该植入物的安全性和有效性已得到证实。在此,我们总结其长期疗效。
一项随机、对照、双盲研究,纳入100例药物治疗无效且被认为适合行ESS翻修术的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)患者。治疗组患者(n = 57)在门诊接受植入物置入。对照组患者(n = 43)接受假手术。3个月时由临床医生进行内镜分级,并由3名鼻窦外科医生组成的小组对随机视频内镜检查进行独立评估以进行验证。6个月随访包括内镜分级和患者报告的结局。
6个月时,治疗组患者的鼻阻塞症状评估(NOSE)评分有显著改善(p = 0.021),平均鼻阻塞/充血评分改善超过2倍(-1.06±1.4 vs -0.44±1.4;p = 0.124)。在内镜检查中,与对照组相比,治疗组患者的筛窦阻塞情况有显著改善(p < 0.001),双侧息肉分级也有改善(p = 0.018)。小组评估证实筛窦阻塞情况有显著改善(p = 0.010),双侧息肉分级改善2倍(p = 0.099),在67例双侧基线息肉负担≥2级的患者亚组中达到统计学显著性(p = 0.049)。6个月时,对照组患者被再次建议行ESS的风险比治疗组患者高3.6倍。
观察到的症状和内镜改善证实了类固醇洗脱植入物对ESS后CRSwNP门诊治疗的有效性。这些6个月的长期研究结果表明,类固醇洗脱植入物是该患者群体一种持久、安全且有效的治疗策略。