van Dyk Nicol, Bahr Roald, Whiteley Rodney, Tol Johannes L, Kumar Bhavesh D, Hamilton Bruce, Farooq Abdulaziz, Witvrouw Erik
Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar
Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1789-95. doi: 10.1177/0363546516632526. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
A hamstring strain injury (HSI) has become the most common noncontact injury in soccer. Isokinetic muscle strength deficits are considered a risk factor for HSIs. However, underpowered studies with small sample sizes unable to determine small associations have led to inconclusive results regarding the role of isokinetic strength and strength testing in HSIs.
To examine whether differences in isokinetic strength measures of knee flexion and extension represent risk factors for hamstring injuries in a large cohort of professional soccer players in an adequately powered study design.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
A total of 614 professional soccer players from 14 teams underwent isokinetic strength testing during preseason screening. Testing consisted of concentric knee flexion and extension at 60 deg/s and 300 deg/s and eccentric knee extension at 60 deg/s. A clustered multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with the risk of HSIs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to determine sensitivity and specificity.
Of the 614 players, 190 suffered an HSI during the 4 seasons. Quadriceps concentric strength at 60 deg/s (odds ratio [OR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.03-1.92; P = .03) and hamstring eccentric strength at 60 deg/s (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.01-1.85; P = .04) adjusted for bodyweight were independently associated with the risk of injuries. The absolute differences between the injured and uninjured players were 6.9 N·m and 9.1 N·m, with small effect sizes (d < 0.2). The ROC analyses showed an area under the curve of 0.54 and 0.56 for quadriceps concentric strength and hamstring eccentric strength, respectively, indicating a failed combined sensitivity and specificity of the 2 strength variables identified in the logistic regression models.
This study identified small absolute strength differences and a wide overlap of the absolute strength measurements at the group level. The small associations between lower hamstring eccentric strength and lower quadriceps concentric strength with HSIs can only be considered as weak risk factors. The identification of these risk factors still does not allow the identification of individual players at risk. The use of isokinetic testing to determine the association between strength differences and HSIs is not supported.
腘绳肌拉伤(HSI)已成为足球运动中最常见的非接触性损伤。等速肌力不足被认为是腘绳肌拉伤的一个风险因素。然而,样本量小且功效不足的研究无法确定小的关联,导致关于等速肌力和力量测试在腘绳肌拉伤中的作用的结果尚无定论。
在一项功效充足的研究设计中,检查一大群职业足球运动员的膝关节屈伸等速肌力测量差异是否代表腘绳肌损伤的风险因素。
队列研究;证据等级,2级。
来自14支球队的614名职业足球运动员在季前赛筛查期间接受了等速肌力测试。测试包括60°/秒和300°/秒的膝关节向心屈伸以及60°/秒的膝关节离心伸展。采用聚类多元逻辑回归分析来确定与腘绳肌拉伤风险相关的变量。计算受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线以确定敏感性和特异性。
在614名球员中,有190人在4个赛季中发生了腘绳肌拉伤。调整体重后,60°/秒时的股四头肌向心力量(优势比[OR],1.41;95%可信区间,1.03 - 1.92;P = 0.03)和60°/秒时的腘绳肌离心力量(OR,1.37;95%可信区间,1.01 - 1.85;P = 0.04)与受伤风险独立相关。受伤球员和未受伤球员之间的绝对差异分别为6.9牛·米和9.1牛·米,效应量较小(d < 0.2)。ROC分析显示,股四头肌向心力量和腘绳肌离心力量的曲线下面积分别为0.54和0.56,这表明逻辑回归模型中确定的两个力量变量的敏感性和特异性组合未能达到理想效果。
本研究确定了组间绝对力量差异较小且绝对力量测量值有很大重叠。腘绳肌离心力量较低和股四头肌向心力量较低与腘绳肌拉伤之间的小关联只能被视为较弱的风险因素。识别这些风险因素仍无法确定个体的受伤风险。不支持使用等速测试来确定力量差异与腘绳肌拉伤之间的关联。