Magaye Ruth, Gu Yuanliang, Wang Yafei, Su Hong, Zhou Qi, Mao Guochuan, Shi Hongbo, Yue Xia, Zou Baobo, Xu Jin, Zhao Jinshun
Department of Preventative Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathological and Physiological Technology, Medicine School of Ningbo University, 818 Fenghua Road, Jiangbei District, Ningbo, 315211, China.
J Mol Histol. 2016 Jun;47(3):273-86. doi: 10.1007/s10735-016-9671-6. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
Nickel nanoparticles (Ni NPs) have been applied in various fields along with the rapid development of nanotechnology. However, the potential adverse health effects of the Ni NPs are unclear. To investigate the cyto- and genotoxicity and compare the differences between the Ni NPs and the nickel fine particles (Ni FPs), Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats and A549 cells were treated with different doses of Ni NPs or FPs. Intra-tracheal instillation of Ni NPs and FPs caused acute toxicity in the lungs, liver and kidneys of the SD rats. Even though the histology of the lungs showed hyperplastic changes and the protein expression of HO-1 and Nrf2 detected by western blot showed lung burden overload, no significant increase was observed to the expression level of oncoprotein C-myc. The results from cell titer-Glo assay and comet assay indicated that Ni NPs were more potent in causing cell toxicity and genotoxicity in vitro than Ni FPs. In addition, Ni NPs increased the expression of C-myc in vitro, but these increases may not have been due to oxidative stress since no significant dose-dependent changes were seen in HO-1 and Nrf2 expressions. Although Ni NPs have the potential to cause DNA damage in A549 cells in vitro, the molecular mechanisms that led to these changes and their tumorigenic potential is still debatable. In short, Ni NPs were more potent in causing cell toxicity and genotoxicity in vitro than Ni FPs, and intra-tracheal instillation of Ni NPs and FPs caused toxicity in organs of the SD rats, while it showed similar to the effects for both particle types. These results suggested that both Ni NPs and FPs have the potential to be harmful to human health, and Ni NPs may have higher cyto- and genotoxic effects than Ni FPs under the same treatment dose.
随着纳米技术的快速发展,镍纳米颗粒(Ni NPs)已被应用于各个领域。然而,Ni NPs对健康的潜在不良影响尚不清楚。为了研究细胞毒性和遗传毒性,并比较Ni NPs与镍细颗粒(Ni FPs)之间的差异,用不同剂量的Ni NPs或FPs处理Sprague-Dawley(SD)大鼠和A549细胞。气管内滴注Ni NPs和FPs对SD大鼠的肺、肝和肾造成急性毒性。尽管肺组织学显示增生性变化,且通过蛋白质印迹法检测到的HO-1和Nrf2蛋白表达显示肺负担过载,但癌蛋白C-myc的表达水平未观察到显著增加。细胞活力检测和彗星试验结果表明,在体外,Ni NPs比Ni FPs更具细胞毒性和遗传毒性。此外,Ni NPs在体外增加了C-myc的表达,但这些增加可能不是由于氧化应激,因为HO-1和Nrf2表达未见明显的剂量依赖性变化。虽然Ni NPs在体外有导致A549细胞DNA损伤的潜力,但导致这些变化的分子机制及其致癌潜力仍存在争议。简而言之,在体外,Ni NPs比Ni FPs更具细胞毒性和遗传毒性,气管内滴注Ni NPs和FPs对SD大鼠的器官造成毒性,且两种颗粒类型的影响相似。这些结果表明,Ni NPs和FPs都有可能对人类健康有害,并且在相同处理剂量下,Ni NPs可能比Ni FPs具有更高的细胞毒性和遗传毒性。