Åkerlund Emma, Cappellini Francesca, Di Bucchianico Sebastiano, Islam Shafiqul, Skoglund Sara, Derr Remco, Odnevall Wallinder Inger, Hendriks Giel, Karlsson Hanna L
Unit of Biochemical Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Division of Surface and Corrosion Science, School of Chemical Science and Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2018 Apr;59(3):211-222. doi: 10.1002/em.22163. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
Nickel (Ni) compounds are classified as carcinogenic to humans but the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. Furthermore, effects related to nanoparticles (NPs) of Ni have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to investigate genotoxicity and mutagenicity of Ni and NiO NPs and compare the effect to soluble Ni from NiCl . We employed different models; i.e., exposure of (1) human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEC) followed by DNA strand break analysis (comet assay and γ-H2AX staining); (2) six different mouse embryonic stem (mES) reporter cell lines (ToxTracker) that are constructed to exhibit fluorescence upon the induction of various pathways of relevance for (geno)toxicity and cancer; and (3) mES cells followed by mutagenicity testing (Hprt assay). The results showed increased DNA strand breaks (comet assay) for the NiO NPs and at higher doses also for the Ni NPs whereas no effects were observed for Ni ions/complexes from NiCl . By employing the reporter cell lines, oxidative stress was observed as the main toxic mechanism and protein unfolding occurred at cytotoxic doses for all three Ni-containing materials. Oxidative stress was also detected in the HBEC cells following NP-exposure. None of these materials induced the reporter related to direct DNA damage and stalled replication forks. A small but statistically significant increase in Hprt mutations was observed for NiO but only at one dose. We conclude that Ni and NiO NPs show more pronounced (geno)toxic effects compared to Ni ions/complexes, indicating more serious health concerns. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 59:211-222, 2018. © 2017 The Authors Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Environmental Mutagen Society.
镍(Ni)化合物被归类为对人类致癌物质,但其潜在机制仍知之甚少。此外,与镍纳米颗粒(NPs)相关的影响尚未完全阐明。本研究的目的是调查镍和氧化镍纳米颗粒的遗传毒性和致突变性,并将其与氯化镍中的可溶性镍的影响进行比较。我们采用了不同的模型;即,(1)人支气管上皮细胞(HBEC)暴露后进行DNA链断裂分析(彗星试验和γ-H2AX染色);(2)六种不同的小鼠胚胎干细胞(mES)报告细胞系(ToxTracker),这些细胞系构建为在诱导与(基因)毒性和癌症相关的各种途径时发出荧光;以及(3)mES细胞暴露后进行致突变性测试(次黄嘌呤-鸟嘌呤磷酸核糖转移酶试验)。结果显示,氧化镍纳米颗粒以及较高剂量的镍纳米颗粒会增加DNA链断裂(彗星试验),而氯化镍中的镍离子/络合物未观察到影响。通过使用报告细胞系,观察到氧化应激是主要的毒性机制,并且在所有三种含镍材料的细胞毒性剂量下都会发生蛋白质解折叠。纳米颗粒暴露后,在HBEC细胞中也检测到氧化应激。这些材料均未诱导与直接DNA损伤和停滞复制叉相关的报告信号。仅在一个剂量下观察到氧化镍的次黄嘌呤-鸟嘌呤磷酸核糖转移酶突变有小幅但具有统计学意义的增加。我们得出结论,与镍离子/络合物相比,镍和氧化镍纳米颗粒显示出更明显的(基因)毒性作用,表明对健康的担忧更为严重。《环境与分子诱变》59:211 - 222,2018年。© 2017作者。《环境与分子诱变》由威利期刊公司代表环境诱变学会出版。