Suppr超能文献

记忆中的项目与客体:论覆盖作为短期记忆遗忘机制的不合理性

The Item versus the Object in Memory: On the Implausibility of Overwriting As a Mechanism for Forgetting in Short-Term Memory.

作者信息

Beaman C Philip, Jones Dylan M

机构信息

Centre for Cognition Research, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading Reading, UK.

School of Psychology, Cardiff University Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 10;7:341. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00341. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

The nature of forgetting in short-term memory remains a disputed topic, with much debate focussed upon whether decay plays a fundamental role (Berman et al., 2009; Altmann and Schunn, 2012; Barrouillet et al., 2012; Neath and Brown, 2012; Oberauer and Lewandowsky, 2013; Ricker et al., 2014) but much less focus on other plausible mechanisms. One such mechanism of long-standing in auditory memory is overwriting (e.g., Crowder and Morton, 1969) in which some aspects of a representation are "overwritten" and rendered inaccessible by the subsequent presentation of a further item. Here, we review the evidence for different forms of overwriting (at the feature and item levels) and examine the plausibility of this mechanism both as a form of auditory memory and when viewed in the context of a larger hearing, speech and language understanding system.

摘要

短期记忆中遗忘的本质仍是一个存在争议的话题,许多争论集中在衰退是否起根本作用(伯曼等人,2009年;阿尔特曼和舒恩,2012年;巴鲁伊莱等人,2012年;内斯和布朗,2012年;奥伯奥尔和莱万多夫斯基,2013年;里克等人,2014年),但对其他可能机制的关注则少得多。听觉记忆中一种长期存在的机制是覆盖(例如,克劳德和莫顿,1969年),即表征的某些方面被“覆盖”,随后呈现的另一个项目使其无法访问。在这里,我们回顾了不同形式覆盖(在特征和项目层面)的证据,并考察了这一机制作为听觉记忆形式以及在更大的听力、言语和语言理解系统背景下的合理性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/361f/4785147/cd12eb0e11a7/fpsyg-07-00341-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验