• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算埃塞俄比亚难民环境中女性人工流产的发生率。

Estimating the incidence of induced abortion among women in refugee settings in Ethiopia.

作者信息

Wado Yohannes Dibaba, Küng Stephanie, Odwe George, Dessie Yadeta, Habteyesus Dagim, Wandera Bonnie, Rich Caitlin, Kisaakye Peter, Kabiru Caroline W, Obare Francis, Giorgio Margaret

机构信息

African Population and Health Research Center, APHRC Campus, 2nd floor, Manga Close, P.O. Box 10787-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10038, USA.

出版信息

Confl Health. 2025 Jul 1;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13031-025-00676-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13031-025-00676-y
PMID:40598564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12211797/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is little evidence of the magnitude of unintended pregnancy and unsafe abortion in humanitarian settings, but the extent and consequences of unintended pregnancy and unsafe abortion are likely to be exacerbated among refugee populations. This study estimated the incidence of induced abortion among women in refugee settings in Ethiopia.

METHODS

This study was conducted in 22 of the 24 refugee camps located in Ethiopia. We used data from a Health Facilities Survey (HFS) of 75 health facilities providing postabortion care (PAC) or safe abortion care (SAC) services within or outside the 22 refugee camps and a Knowledgeable Informant Survey (KIS) of 69 individuals knowledgeable about induced abortion among refugee populations. We estimated the annual postabortion caseload, the number of induced abortions, and the induced abortion rate per 1,000 women of reproductive age.

RESULTS

We estimated that 9,044 (95% CI: 6,633 - 11,455) women in refugee settings received PAC across the 75 facilities in 2023, while some 2,946 (95% CI: 1,826-4,066) women received SAC. The overall induced abortion incidence rate among women in refugee settings living in camps in Ethiopia was estimated to be 38.3 per 1,000 women aged 15-49 years, with slight variations by region. The proportion of safe abortions obtained from the formal health system was 11.5% in all camps, with a slightly higher proportion of abortions estimated to take place within facilities in Western camps (12.9%) compared to Eastern and Northeastern camps (9.7%).

CONCLUSION

The study found that abortion incidence is high among women in refugee settings in Ethiopia, and only a small proportion of induced abortions were conducted through SAC services. There is an urgent need to improve family planning, SAC, and PAC services in refugee camps.

摘要

背景

在人道主义环境中,意外怀孕和不安全堕胎的规模几乎没有证据可查,但意外怀孕和不安全堕胎的程度及后果在难民群体中可能会加剧。本研究估计了埃塞俄比亚难民营中女性人工流产的发生率。

方法

本研究在埃塞俄比亚的24个难民营中的22个开展。我们使用了来自75家提供流产后护理(PAC)或安全堕胎护理(SAC)服务的医疗机构的卫生设施调查(HFS)数据,这些机构分布在22个难民营内外,还使用了对69名了解难民营中人工流产情况的知情者的知情者调查(KIS)数据。我们估计了每年的流产后病例数、人工流产数以及每1000名育龄妇女的人工流产率。

结果

我们估计,2023年在75家机构中,难民营中有9044名(95%置信区间:6633 - 11455)妇女接受了PAC,约2946名(95%置信区间:1826 - 4066)妇女接受了SAC。埃塞俄比亚难民营中15至49岁的女性人工流产总发生率估计为每1000名妇女中有38.3例,各地区略有差异。在所有难民营中,通过正规卫生系统进行的安全堕胎比例为11.5%,与东部和东北部难民营(9.7%)相比,估计西部难民营内设施进行的堕胎比例略高(12.9%)。

结论

该研究发现,埃塞俄比亚难民营中女性的堕胎发生率很高,只有一小部分人工流产是通过SAC服务进行的。迫切需要改善难民营中的计划生育、SAC和PAC服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6709/12211797/aeca43e3f063/13031_2025_676_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6709/12211797/aeca43e3f063/13031_2025_676_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6709/12211797/aeca43e3f063/13031_2025_676_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating the incidence of induced abortion among women in refugee settings in Ethiopia.估算埃塞俄比亚难民环境中女性人工流产的发生率。
Confl Health. 2025 Jul 1;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13031-025-00676-y.
2
Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices.流产后立即放置宫内节育器。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD001777. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001777.
3
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Antioxidants for female subfertility.用于女性生育力低下的抗氧化剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 28;7(7):CD007807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007807.pub3.
6
Disclosure to social network members among abortion-seeking women in low- and middle-income countries with restrictive access: a systematic review.寻求堕胎的中低收入国家的妇女向社交网络成员披露信息:系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jun 7;18(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01165-0.
7
The use of telemedicine services for medical abortion.远程医疗服务在药物流产中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 4;6(6):CD013764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013764.pub2.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating Incidence of Induced Abortion and Unintended Pregnancy Among Women in Refugee Settlements in Uganda.估算乌干达难民营中女性的人工流产和意外怀孕发生率。
Stud Fam Plann. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1111/sifp.70010.
2
Self-reported abortion experiences in Ethiopia and Uganda, new evidence from cross-sectional community-based surveys.埃塞俄比亚和乌干达的自我报告堕胎经历:基于社区横断面调查的新证据
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Sep 8;3(9):e0002340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002340. eCollection 2023.
3
Knowledge of the abortion law and key legal issues of sexual and reproductive health and rights among recently arrived migrants in Sweden: a cross-sectional survey.
瑞典新移民对堕胎法及性健康和生殖健康权利关键法律问题的认知:一项横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 23;23(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15399-z.
4
Sexual and reproductive health and rights in humanitarian settings: a matter of life and death.人道主义环境中的性与生殖健康和权利:生死攸关的问题。
Reprod Health. 2023 Mar 10;20(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01594-z.
5
"I was afraid they will be judging me and even deny me the service": Experiences of denial and dissuasion during abortion care in Ethiopia.“我担心他们会评判我,甚至拒绝为我提供服务”:埃塞俄比亚堕胎护理期间被拒绝和劝阻的经历。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Nov 1;3:984386. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.984386. eCollection 2022.
6
Liberalizing abortion to reduce maternal mortality: expanding access to all Ethiopians.放宽堕胎限制以降低孕产妇死亡率:让所有埃塞俄比亚人都能更方便地获得堕胎服务。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 27;19(Suppl 1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01457-z.
7
Accountability strategies for sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights in humanitarian settings: a scoping review.人道主义环境下性与生殖健康及生殖权利的问责策略:一项范围综述
Confl Health. 2020 Apr 7;14:18. doi: 10.1186/s13031-020-00264-2. eCollection 2020.
8
Exploring Congolese refugees' experiences with abortion care in Uganda: a multi-methods qualitative study.探索刚果难民在乌干达的堕胎护理体验:一项多方法定性研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019 Dec;27(1):1681091. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2019.1681091.
9
Sexual and reproductive health and rights in humanitarian crises at ICPD25+ and beyond: consolidating gains to ensure access to services for all.国际人口与发展会议25周年及以后人道主义危机中的性与生殖健康及权利:巩固成果以确保人人都能获得服务
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019 Dec;27(1):1676513. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2019.1676513.
10
When the law makes doors slightly open: ethical dilemmas among abortion service providers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.当法律让门微开之时:埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴堕胎服务提供者面临的伦理困境
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Sep 5;20(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0396-4.