Santhanakrishnan Rajalakshmi, Wang Na, Larson Martin G, Magnani Jared W, Vasan Ramachandran S, Wang Thomas J, Yap Jonathan, Feng Liang, Yap Keng B, Ong Hean Y, Ng Tze P, Richards Arthur Mark, Lam Carolyn S P, Ho Jennifer E
Cardiovascular Medicine Section, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Data Coordinating Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Mar 25;5(3):e002956. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002956.
Racial differences in electrocardiographic (ECG) characteristics and prognostic significance among Whites and Asians are not well described.
We studied 2677 White Framingham Heart Study participants (57% women) and 2972 Asian (64% women) Singapore Longitudinal Aging Study participants (mean age 66 years in both) free of myocardial infarction or heart failure. Racial differences in ECG characteristics and effect on mortality were assessed. In linear regression models, PR interval was longer in Asians compared with Whites (multivariable-adjusted β±SE 5.0±1.4 ms in men and 6.6±0.9 ms in women, both P<0.0006). QT interval was shorter in Asian men (β±SE -6.2±1.2 ms, P<0.0001) and longer in Asian women (β±SE 3.6±0.9 ms, P=0.02) compared to White men and women, respectively. Asians had greater odds of having ECG left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) compared with Whites (odds ratio [OR] 3.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-9.35 for men, OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.35-2.76 for women, both P<0.02). Over a mean follow-up of 11±3 years in Framingham and 8±3 years in Singapore, mortality rates were 24.5 and 13.4 per 1000 person-years among Whites and Asians, respectively. In Cox models, the presence of LVH had a greater effect on all-cause mortality in Asians compared with Whites (hazard ratio [HR] 2.66, 95% CI 1.83-3.88 vs HR 1.30, 95% CI 0.90-1.89, P for interaction=0.02).
Our findings from two large community-based cohorts show prominent race differences in ECG characteristics between Whites and Asians, and also suggest a differential association with mortality. These differences may carry implications for race-specific ECG reference ranges and cardiovascular risk.
白人和亚洲人在心电图(ECG)特征及预后意义方面的种族差异尚未得到充分描述。
我们研究了2677名参加弗雷明汉心脏研究的白人参与者(57%为女性)和2972名参加新加坡纵向老龄化研究的亚洲参与者(64%为女性)(两者平均年龄均为66岁),这些参与者均无心肌梗死或心力衰竭。评估了ECG特征的种族差异及其对死亡率的影响。在线性回归模型中,与白人相比,亚洲人的PR间期更长(多变量调整后的β±标准误:男性为5.0±1.4毫秒,女性为6.6±0.9毫秒,P均<0.0006)。与白人男性和女性相比,亚洲男性的QT间期更短(β±标准误为-6.2±1.2毫秒,P<0.0001)而亚洲女性的QT间期更长(β±标准误为为3.6±0.9毫秒,P=0.02)。与白人相比,亚洲人发生ECG左心室肥厚(LVH)的几率更高(男性优势比[OR]为3.56,95%置信区间[CI]为1.36 - 9.35;女性OR为1.93,95%CI为1.35 - 2.76,P均<0.02)。在弗雷明汉平均随访11±3年,在新加坡平均随访8±3年,白人的死亡率为每1000人年24.5例,亚洲人的死亡率为每1000人年13.4例。在Cox模型中,与白人相比,LVH的存在对亚洲人全因死亡率的影响更大(风险比[HR]为2.66,95%CI为1.83 - 3.88,而白人HR为1.30,95%CI为0.90 - 1.89,交互作用P=0.02)。
我们从两个大型社区队列研究中得出的结果显示,白人和亚洲人在ECG特征方面存在显著的种族差异,并且也提示了与死亡率的差异关联。这些差异可能对种族特异性ECG参考范围和心血管风险具有启示意义。