Kidane Biniam, Sulman Joanne, Xu Wei, Kong Qin Quinn, Wong Rebecca, Knox Jennifer J, Darling Gail E
Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Divison of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Divison of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jun;151(6):1571-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.01.052. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus is a health-related quality of life instrument validated in patients with esophageal cancer. It is composed of a general component and an esophageal cancer subscale. Our objective was to determine whether the baseline Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus and esophageal cancer subscale scores are associated with survival in patients with stage II and III cancer of the gastroesophageal junction or thoracic esophagus.
Data from 4 prospective studies in Canadian academic hospitals were combined. These included consecutive patients with stage II and III esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery or chemoradiation/radiation alone. All patients completed baseline Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus and esophageal cancer subscale scores were dichotomized on the basis of median scores. Cox regression analyses were performed.
There were 207 patients treated between 1996 and 2014. Mean age was 61 ± 10.6 years. Approximately 69.6% of patients (n = 144) had adenocarcinoma. All patients had more than 9 months of follow-up. In patients with stage II and III, 93 deaths were observed. When treated as continuous variables, baseline Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus and esophageal cancer subscale were associated with survival with hazard ratios of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.96; P = .005) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.56-0.82; P < .001), respectively. When dichotomized, they were also associated with survival with a hazard ratio of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.38-0.89; P = .01) and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.28-0.67; P < .001), respectively.
In patients with stage II and III esophageal cancer being considered for therapy, higher baseline Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus and esophageal cancer subscale were independently associated with longer survival, even after adjusting for age, stage, histology, and therapy received. Further study is needed, but Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus may be useful as a prognostic tool to inform patient decision-making and patient selection criteria for studies.
癌症治疗功能评估量表-食管癌是一种在食管癌患者中得到验证的与健康相关的生活质量工具。它由一个通用部分和一个食管癌分量表组成。我们的目的是确定癌症治疗功能评估量表-食管癌和食管癌分量表的基线评分是否与胃食管交界或胸段食管癌II期和III期患者的生存率相关。
合并了加拿大教学医院4项前瞻性研究的数据。这些研究包括连续的II期和III期食管癌患者,他们接受了新辅助治疗,随后接受手术或单纯放化疗。所有患者均完成了癌症治疗功能评估量表-食管癌的基线评估。癌症治疗功能评估量表-食管癌和食管癌分量表评分根据中位数进行二分法划分。进行了Cox回归分析。
1996年至2014年间共治疗了207例患者。平均年龄为61±10.6岁。约69.6%的患者(n = 144)患有腺癌。所有患者的随访时间均超过9个月。在II期和III期患者中,观察到93例死亡。当作为连续变量处理时,癌症治疗功能评估量表-食管癌和食管癌分量表的基线评分与生存率相关,风险比分别为0.89(95%置信区间[CI],0.81-0.96;P = .005)和0.68(95% CI,0.56-0.82;P < .001)。当进行二分法划分时,它们也与生存率相关,风险比分别为0.58(95% CI,0.38-0.89;P = .01)和0.43(95% CI,0.28-0.67;P < .001)。
在考虑接受治疗的II期和III期食管癌患者中,即使在调整年龄、分期、组织学和接受的治疗后,较高的癌症治疗功能评估量表-食管癌和食管癌分量表基线评分也与更长的生存期独立相关。需要进一步研究,但癌症治疗功能评估量表-食管癌可能作为一种预后工具,为患者决策和研究的患者选择标准提供参考。