Egan Mark, Daly Michael, Delaney Liam
Behavioural Science Centre, Stirling Management School, Stirling University, FK94LA, United Kingdom.
Behavioural Science Centre, Stirling Management School, Stirling University, FK94LA, United Kingdom; UCD Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Soc Sci Med. 2016 May;156:98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
Several studies have shown a link between psychological distress in early life and subsequent higher unemployment, but none have used sibling models to account for the unobserved family background characteristics which may explain the relationship.
This paper uses the National Longitudinal Study of Youth 1997 data to examine whether adolescent psychological distress in 2000 predicts higher unemployment over 2000-11, whether this relationship changed in the period following the Great Recession, and whether it is robust to adjustment for family effects.
7125 cohort members (2986 siblings) self-reported their mental health in 2000 and employment activities over 2000-11. This association was examined using Probit and ordinary least squares regressions controlling for intelligence, physical health, other sociodemographic characteristics and family background.
After adjustment for covariates and compared to those with low distress, highly distressed adolescents were 2.7 percentage points (32%) more likely to be unemployed, 5.1 points (26%) more likely to be unemployed or out of the labor force and experienced 11 weeks (28%) more unemployment. The impact of high distress was similar to a one standard deviation decrease in intelligence, and double the magnitude of having a serious physical health problem, and these estimates were robust to adjustment for family fixed-effects. The highly distressed were also disproportionately more likely to become unemployed or exit the labor force in the years following the Great Recession.
These findings provide strong evidence of the unemployment penalty of early-life psychological distress and suggest that this relationship may be intensified during economic recessions. Investing in mental health in early life may be an effective way to reduce unemployment.
多项研究表明,早年的心理困扰与随后较高的失业率之间存在联系,但尚无研究使用兄弟姐妹模型来解释可能导致这种关系的未观察到的家庭背景特征。
本文利用1997年全国青年纵向研究数据,检验2000年青少年心理困扰是否能预测2000 - 2011年期间较高的失业率,这种关系在大衰退后的时期是否发生变化,以及对家庭效应进行调整后是否依然稳健。
7125名队列成员(2986对兄弟姐妹)在2000年自我报告了他们的心理健康状况以及2000 - 2011年期间的就业活动。使用Probit模型和普通最小二乘法回归分析这种关联,同时控制智力、身体健康、其他社会人口学特征和家庭背景。
在对协变量进行调整后,与心理困扰程度低的青少年相比,心理困扰程度高的青少年失业的可能性高出2.7个百分点(32%),失业或退出劳动力市场的可能性高出5.1个百分点(26%),失业时间多出11周(28%)。高度困扰的影响类似于智力下降一个标准差,是患有严重身体健康问题影响程度的两倍,并且这些估计在对家庭固定效应进行调整后依然稳健。在大衰退后的几年里,高度困扰的人失业或退出劳动力市场的可能性也不成比例地更高。
这些发现为早年心理困扰导致失业惩罚提供了有力证据,并表明这种关系在经济衰退期间可能会加剧。在早年投资心理健康可能是降低失业率的有效途径。