Suppr超能文献

成年期的身份认同形成:一项从27岁到50岁的纵向研究。

Identity Formation in Adulthood: A Longitudinal Study from Age 27 to 50.

作者信息

Fadjukoff Päivi, Pulkkinen Lea, Kokko Katja

机构信息

Agora Center, University of Jyväskylä , Jyväskylä , Finland.

Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä , Jyväskylä , Finland.

出版信息

Identity (Mahwah, N J). 2016 Jan 2;16(1):8-23. doi: 10.1080/15283488.2015.1121820. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

Abstract

Longitudinal patterns of identity formation were analyzed in a representative cohort group of Finnish men and women born in 1959 across ages 27, 36, 42, and 50. The data were drawn from the Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Personality. Identity status (diffused, moratorium, foreclosed, achieved) from all four ages was available for 172 participants (54% females). Marcia's Identity Status Interview used in this research included five domains: religious beliefs, political identity, occupational career, intimate relationships, and lifestyle. The findings indicated great variability in identity status across domains at each age level, and the identity trajectories fluctuated from age 27 to 50. The developmental trend from age 27 to 50 was moderately progressive (toward achievement) for the five domains and for overall identity, with the exception of a slightly regressive trend in male religious identity. Remaining stable in the same status category across the four measurements was rare and emerged only for diffusion in the ideological domains. Women generally outnumbered men in identity achievement at earlier ages, but the gender differences diminished in most domains at age 50, except in religious identity. In women overall diffusion decreased over time, but in men it remained at about 20% at ages 42 and 50.

摘要

对1959年出生的芬兰男性和女性代表性队列群体在27岁、36岁、42岁和50岁时的身份形成纵向模式进行了分析。数据取自于于韦斯屈莱人格纵向研究。172名参与者(54%为女性)有来自所有四个年龄段的身份状态(弥散型、延缓型、早闭型、达成型)数据。本研究中使用的马西亚身份状态访谈包括五个领域:宗教信仰、政治身份、职业、亲密关系和生活方式。研究结果表明,在每个年龄水平上,各领域的身份状态存在很大差异,身份轨迹在27岁至50岁之间波动。从27岁到50岁的发展趋势在五个领域和总体身份方面呈适度进步(趋向达成型),男性宗教身份略有倒退趋势除外。在四次测量中都保持在同一身份状态类别的情况很少见,仅在意识形态领域的弥散型中出现。在身份达成方面,女性在较早年龄通常比男性多,但在50岁时,除宗教身份外,大多数领域的性别差异减小。总体而言,女性的弥散型随着时间推移而减少,但男性在42岁和50岁时仍保持在约20%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b469/4784503/afb87615705a/hidn_a_1121820_f0001_oc.jpg

相似文献

1
Identity Formation in Adulthood: A Longitudinal Study from Age 27 to 50.
Identity (Mahwah, N J). 2016 Jan 2;16(1):8-23. doi: 10.1080/15283488.2015.1121820. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
2
Identity development among Lebanese youth: An investigation of Marcia's paradigm.
Heliyon. 2019 Nov 23;5(11):e02851. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02851. eCollection 2019 Nov.
3
Parental Identity and Its Relation to Parenting and Psychological Functioning in Middle Age.
Parent Sci Pract. 2016 Apr 2;16(2):87-107. doi: 10.1080/15295192.2016.1134989. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
4
Identity statuses as developmental trajectories: a five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescents.
J Youth Adolesc. 2012 Aug;41(8):1008-21. doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9730-y. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
5
Events associated with identity status change.
J Adolesc. 1996 Oct;19(5):477-90. doi: 10.1006/jado.1996.0045.
7
Religious identity among Christian Korean-American adolescents.
Psychol Rep. 2006 Feb;98(1):43-56. doi: 10.2466/pr0.98.1.43-56.
8
A longitudinal study of ego identity development at a liberal arts college.
J Youth Adolesc. 1976 Dec;5(4):361-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01577249.
10
Gender differences in identity development: issues of process, domain and timing.
J Adolesc. 1989 Jun;12(2):117-38. doi: 10.1016/0140-1971(89)90003-1.

引用本文的文献

1
A multidimensional approach to the self in non-human animals through the Pattern Theory of Self.
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 9;16:1561420. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1561420. eCollection 2025.
2
Identity Development and Disruption in Older Adults During COVID-19: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Study.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 May 1;79(5). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae017.
3
Identity Development and Maladaptive Personality Traits in Young Refugees and First- and Second-Generation Migrants.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 21;12:798152. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.798152. eCollection 2021.
4
Trajectories of Identity Formation Modes and Their Personality Context in Adolescence.
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Apr;47(4):775-792. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0824-7. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
5
Parental Identity and Its Relation to Parenting and Psychological Functioning in Middle Age.
Parent Sci Pract. 2016 Apr 2;16(2):87-107. doi: 10.1080/15295192.2016.1134989. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Parental Identity and Its Relation to Parenting and Psychological Functioning in Middle Age.
Parent Sci Pract. 2016 Apr 2;16(2):87-107. doi: 10.1080/15295192.2016.1134989. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
2
Identity six years after: A follow-up study.
J Youth Adolesc. 1976 Jun;5(2):145-60. doi: 10.1007/BF01537490.
3
An extension of Marcia's Identity Status Interview into the interpersonal domain.
J Youth Adolesc. 1982 Feb;11(1):33-47. doi: 10.1007/BF01537815.
4
Identity status change during adolescence and young adulthood: a meta-analysis.
J Adolesc. 2010 Oct;33(5):683-98. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
5
Personality--a resource or risk for successful development.
Scand J Psychol. 2009 Dec;50(6):602-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00774.x.
7
Development in midlife.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:305-31. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141521.
10
Identity, regression and development.
J Adolesc. 1996 Jun;19(3):203-22. doi: 10.1006/jado.1996.0020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验