Suppr超能文献

单节段刚性固定联合Coflex:一项生物力学研究。

Single-Level Rigid Fixation Combined with Coflex: A Biomechanical Study.

作者信息

Che Wu, Chen Qian, Ma Yi-Qun, Jiang Yun-Qi, Yuan Wei, Zhou Xiao-Gang, Li Xi-Lei, Dong Jian

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2016 Mar 29;22:1022-7. doi: 10.12659/msm.896706.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this biomechanical in vitro study was to compare the kinematics and intradiscal pressure achieved with 2 methods: L4-L5 pedicle screw-rod fixation (PSRF) with an upper L3-L4 Coflex device and L4-L5 PSRF alone. The results were used to characterize the biomechanics of the topping-off operation with a Coflex device for the lumbar motion segment adjacent to single-level rigid fixation.

MATERIAL/METHODS: Six human cadaveric spine specimens were biomechanically tested in vitro (6 males, 0 females). The 3-dimensional specimen motion in response to applied loads during flexibility tests was determined. Loads were applied along anatomic axes to induce flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. All specimens were first studied with intact lumbar motion segments, then with L4-L5 PSRF alone, and finally with L4-L5 PSRF with an upper L3-L4 Coflex device. A non-paired comparison of the 3 configurations under 3 different conditions was made.

RESULTS

PSRF, with or without a Coflex device, significantly increased the range of motion (ROM) in the upper adjacent motion segments in all directions of loading. The intradiscal pressure (IDP) changed slightly. A correlation analysis showed that the ROM and IDP are significantly positively correlated. The application of the upper motion segment of the Coflex device provided greater stability in all directions of motion than did PSRF alone, particularly for extension (p<0.05), while use of a Coflex device did not significantly decrease the IDP compared with PSRF alone (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that L4-L5 PSRF with an L3-L4 Coflex device is more stable than L4-L5 PSRF alone. PSRF with an upper Coflex device is a promising alternative to PSRF alone. Based on these biomechanical tests, it might be considered a protective method to prevent adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), although some limitations with this in vitro study must be addressed in the future.

摘要

背景

本体外生物力学研究的目的是比较两种方法所实现的运动学和椎间盘内压力:L4-L5椎弓根螺钉-棒固定术(PSRF)联合上方L3-L4 Coflex装置与单纯L4-L5 PSRF。研究结果用于描述在单节段刚性固定相邻的腰椎运动节段使用Coflex装置进行封顶手术的生物力学特性。

材料/方法:对六个人类尸体脊柱标本进行体外生物力学测试(6名男性,0名女性)。确定了在柔韧性测试期间,标本对施加负荷的三维运动。沿着解剖轴施加负荷以诱发屈伸、侧屈和轴向旋转。所有标本首先在完整的腰椎运动节段进行研究,然后单独使用L4-L5 PSRF进行研究,最后使用L4-L5 PSRF联合上方L3-L4 Coflex装置进行研究。对三种不同条件下的三种构型进行了非配对比较。

结果

无论有无Coflex装置,PSRF均显著增加了上相邻运动节段在所有负荷方向上的活动范围(ROM)。椎间盘内压力(IDP)变化轻微。相关性分析表明,ROM和IDP显著正相关。与单独使用PSRF相比,Coflex装置在上运动节段的应用在所有运动方向上提供了更大的稳定性,尤其是在伸展时(p<0.05),而与单独使用PSRF相比,使用Coflex装置并没有显著降低IDP(p>0.05)。

结论

这些结果表明,L4-L5 PSRF联合L3-L4 Coflex装置比单独使用L4-L5 PSRF更稳定。带有上方Coflex装置的PSRF是单独使用PSRF的一种有前景的替代方法。基于这些生物力学测试,尽管未来必须解决本体外研究的一些局限性,但它可能被视为预防相邻节段退变(ASD)的一种保护方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3985/4815995/c1594bc0e8e3/medscimonit-22-1022-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验