Reilly T, Crawford G, Lobo R, Leavy J, Jancey J
Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, WA 6845, Australia.
Health Promot J Austr. 2016 Apr;27(1):54-60. doi: 10.1071/HE15059.
Issue addressed Evidence-informed practice underpinned by ethics is fundamental to developing the science of health promotion. Knowledge and application of ethical principles are competencies required for health promotion practice. However, these competencies are often inconsistently understood and applied. This research explored attitudes, practices, enablers and barriers related to ethics in practice in Western Australian health organisations. Methods Semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 health promotion practitioners, purposefully selected to provide a cross-section of government and non-government organisations. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and then themed. Results The majority of participants reported consideration of ethics in their practice; however, only half reported seeking Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) approval for projects in the past 12 months. Enablers identified as supporting ethics in practice and disseminating findings included: support preparing ethics applications; resources and training about ethical practice; ability to access HRECs for ethics approval; and a supportive organisational culture. Barriers included: limited time; insufficient resourcing and capacity; ethics approval not seen as part of core business; and concerns about academic writing. Conclusion The majority of participants were aware of the importance of ethics in practice and the dissemination of findings. However, participants reported barriers to engaging in formal ethics processes and to publishing findings. So what? Alignment of evidence-informed and ethics-based practice is critical. Resources and information about ethics may be required to support practice and encourage dissemination of findings, including in the peer-reviewed literature. Investigating the role of community-based ethics boards may be valuable to bridging the ethics-evidence gap.
所探讨的问题 以伦理为基础的循证实践是发展健康促进科学的根本。伦理原则的知识与应用是健康促进实践所需的能力。然而,这些能力的理解和应用往往并不一致。本研究探讨了西澳大利亚州卫生组织实践中与伦理相关的态度、做法、促进因素和障碍。
方法 对10名健康促进从业者进行了半结构化的深入访谈,这些从业者是经过有目的地挑选出来的,以提供政府和非政府组织的一个横断面。访谈进行了录音、转录,然后进行了主题分析。
结果 大多数参与者报告在其实践中考虑了伦理问题;然而,在过去12个月中,只有一半的人报告为项目寻求了人类研究伦理委员会(HREC)的批准。被确定为在实践中支持伦理并传播研究结果的促进因素包括:支持准备伦理申请;关于伦理实践的资源和培训;有能力获得HREC的伦理批准;以及支持性的组织文化。障碍包括:时间有限;资源和能力不足;伦理批准未被视为核心业务的一部分;以及对学术写作的担忧。
结论 大多数参与者意识到伦理在实践和研究结果传播中的重要性。然而,参与者报告了在参与正式伦理程序和发表研究结果方面存在障碍。那又如何?循证实践与基于伦理的实践保持一致至关重要。可能需要有关伦理的资源和信息来支持实践并鼓励研究结果的传播,包括在同行评审文献中。调查基于社区的伦理委员会的作用对于弥合伦理与证据之间的差距可能很有价值。