Rothstein N M, Higashi G, Yates J, Rajan T V
Department of Microbiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1989 Mar 15;33(3):229-35. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(89)90084-4.
Infestation with organisms causing lymphatic filariasis (i.e. Wuchereria bancrofti and Brugia malayi) results in a variety of clinical presentations. It is possible that some of the variation is due to differences in host response to parasite. To determine whether individuals who live in an endemic area but differ in their clinical manifestations respond to different filarial antigens, we screened Onchocerca volvulus expression libraries with sera from a number of individuals belonging to different clinical groups. The results of the study demonstrate that there are indeed differences in the recognition of three cloned filarial antigens and that this differential recognition is related to clinical symptomatology. The most striking finding is that an Onchocerca volvulus protein homologous to the 70 kDa Xenopus laevis heat shock protein is primarily recognized by individuals who are amicrofilaremic. Further analysis is required to determine whether these antigens play any role in the pathogenesis of filarial infection or have any potential value in protective immunity.
感染引起淋巴丝虫病的生物体(即班氏吴策线虫和马来布鲁线虫)会导致多种临床表现。部分差异可能是由于宿主对寄生虫的反应不同所致。为了确定生活在流行地区但临床表现不同的个体是否对不同的丝虫抗原有反应,我们用来自多个不同临床组个体的血清筛选了盘尾丝虫表达文库。研究结果表明,对三种克隆的丝虫抗原的识别确实存在差异,且这种差异识别与临床症状学有关。最显著的发现是,一种与70 kDa非洲爪蟾热休克蛋白同源的盘尾丝虫蛋白主要被无微丝蚴血症的个体识别。需要进一步分析以确定这些抗原在丝虫感染的发病机制中是否起任何作用,或在保护性免疫中是否有任何潜在价值。