Suppr超能文献

儿童贫困:定义与衡量

Child Poverty: Definition and Measurement.

作者信息

Short Kathleen S

机构信息

Social, Economic, and Housing Statistics Division, US Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2016 Apr;16(3 Suppl):S46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.11.005.

Abstract

This article provides a discussion of what we mean when we refer to 'child poverty.' Many images come to mind when we discuss child poverty, but when we try to measure and quantify the extent of child poverty, we often use a very narrow concept. In this article a variety of poverty measures that are used in the United States are described and some of the differences between those measures are illustrated. In this article 3 measures are explored in detail: a relative measure of poverty that is used more often in an international context, the official US poverty measure, and a new supplemental poverty measure (SPM). The new measure differs from the other 2 because it takes into account noncash benefits that are provided to poor families. These include nutrition assistance such as food stamps, subsidized housing, and home energy assistance. The SPM also takes account of necessary expenses that families face, such as taxes and expenses related to work and health care. Comparing estimates for 2012, the SPM showed lower poverty rates for children than the other 2 measures. Because noncash benefits help those in extreme poverty, there were also lower percentages of children in extreme poverty with resources below half the SPM threshold. These results suggest that 2 important measures of poverty, the relative measure used in international comparisons, and the official poverty measure, are not able to gauge the effect of government programs on the alleviation of poverty, and the SPM illustrates that noncash benefits do help families meet their basic needs.

摘要

本文探讨了我们所说的“儿童贫困”的含义。在讨论儿童贫困时,许多画面会浮现在脑海中,但当我们试图衡量和量化儿童贫困的程度时,我们通常使用的是一个非常狭义的概念。本文描述了美国使用的各种贫困衡量标准,并说明了这些标准之间的一些差异。本文详细探讨了三种衡量标准:一种在国际背景下更常用的相对贫困衡量标准、美国官方贫困衡量标准以及一种新的补充贫困衡量标准(SPM)。新的衡量标准与其他两种不同,因为它考虑了向贫困家庭提供的非现金福利。这些福利包括营养援助,如食品券、补贴住房和家庭能源援助。补充贫困衡量标准还考虑了家庭面临的必要开支,如税收以及与工作和医疗保健相关的费用。比较2012年的估计数据,补充贫困衡量标准显示儿童贫困率低于其他两种衡量标准。由于非现金福利帮助了那些处于极端贫困中的人,资源低于补充贫困衡量标准阈值一半的儿童处于极端贫困的比例也较低。这些结果表明,两种重要的贫困衡量标准,即国际比较中使用的相对衡量标准和官方贫困衡量标准,无法衡量政府项目对减轻贫困的影响,而补充贫困衡量标准表明非现金福利确实有助于家庭满足其基本需求。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验