Mansour Jane G, Curran Megan A
Centre for Economic & Social InclusionUS, Washington, DC; University College Dublin, School of Social Policy, Social Work, and Social Justice, Ireland.
University College Dublin, School of Social Policy, Social Work, and Social Justice, Ireland.
Acad Pediatr. 2016 Apr;16(3 Suppl):S76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.012.
The United States has long struggled with high levels of child poverty. In 2014, 2 of 5 (42.9%) of all American children lived in economically insecure households and just over 1 in 5 children lived below the official absolute poverty line. These rates are high, but not intractable. Evidence from the US Census Bureau's Supplemental Poverty Measure, among other sources, shows the effect that public investments in cash and noncash transfers can have in reducing child poverty and improving child well-being. However, with significant disparities in services and supports for children across states and the projected decline of current federal spending on children, the United States is an international outlier in terms of public investments in children, particularly compared with other high-income nations. One such country, the United Kingdom (UK), faced similar child poverty challenges in recent decades. At the end of the 20th century, the British Prime Minister pledged to halve child poverty in a decade and eradicate it 'within a generation.' The Labour Government then set targets and dedicated resources in the form of income supplements, employment, child care, and education support. Child poverty levels nearly halved against an absolute measure by the end of the first decade. Subsequent changes in government and the economy slowed progress and have resulted in a very different approach. However, the UK child poverty target experience, 15 years in and spanning multiple changes in government, still offers a useful comparative example for US social policy moving forward.
长期以来,美国一直饱受儿童贫困率居高不下的困扰。2014年,五分之二(42.9%)的美国儿童生活在经济不安全的家庭中,超过五分之一的儿童生活在官方绝对贫困线以下。这些比率很高,但并非无法解决。美国人口普查局补充贫困衡量标准等来源的证据表明,公共现金和非现金转移支付投资在减少儿童贫困和改善儿童福祉方面所能产生的效果。然而,由于各州在儿童服务和支持方面存在显著差异,以及预计当前联邦政府对儿童支出的下降,美国在对儿童的公共投资方面是国际上的一个异类,尤其是与其他高收入国家相比。英国就是这样一个国家,在最近几十年里也面临着类似的儿童贫困挑战。20世纪末,英国首相承诺在十年内将儿童贫困率减半,并在“一代人的时间内”消除儿童贫困。工党政府随后设定了目标,并以收入补贴、就业、儿童保育和教育支持等形式投入资源。到第一个十年结束时,按照绝对标准衡量,儿童贫困水平几乎减半。随后政府和经济的变化减缓了进展,并导致了一种截然不同的方法。然而,英国儿童贫困目标的经历,历经15年且跨越了政府的多次更迭,仍然为美国未来的社会政策提供了一个有用的可比范例。