Wimer Christopher, Nam JaeHyun, Waldfogel Jane, Fox Liana
Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY.
Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY.
Acad Pediatr. 2016 Apr;16(3 Suppl):S60-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.007.
The official measure of poverty has been used to assess trends in children's poverty rates for many decades. But because of flaws in official poverty statistics, these basic trends have the potential to be misleading. We use an augmented Current Population Survey data set that calculates an improved measure of poverty to reexamine child poverty rates between 1967 and 2012. This measure, the Anchored Supplemental Poverty Measure, is based partially on the US Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics' new Supplemental Poverty Measure. We focus on 3 age groups of children, those aged 0 to 5, 6 to 11, and 12 to 17 years. Young children have the highest poverty rates, both historically and today. However, among all age groups, long-term poverty trends have been more favorable than official statistics would suggest. This is entirely due to the effect of counting resources from government policies and programs, which have reduced poverty rates substantially for children of all ages. However, despite this progress, considerable disparities in the risk of poverty continue to exist by education level and family structure.
几十年来,官方贫困衡量标准一直被用于评估儿童贫困率的趋势。但由于官方贫困统计存在缺陷,这些基本趋势可能会产生误导。我们使用一个经过扩充的当前人口调查数据集,该数据集计算出一种改进的贫困衡量标准,以重新审视1967年至2012年期间的儿童贫困率。这种衡量标准,即锚定补充贫困衡量标准,部分基于美国人口普查局和劳工统计局的新补充贫困衡量标准。我们关注三个儿童年龄组,即0至5岁、6至11岁和12至17岁的儿童。幼儿的贫困率在历史上和如今都是最高的。然而,在所有年龄组中,长期贫困趋势比官方统计数据所显示的更为有利。这完全是由于计入政府政策和项目资源的影响,这些政策和项目大幅降低了各年龄段儿童的贫困率。然而,尽管取得了这一进展,但贫困风险在教育水平和家庭结构方面仍存在相当大的差异。