Petersen Elijah J, Flores-Cervantes D Xanat, Bucheli Thomas D, Elliott Lindsay C C, Fagan Jeffrey A, Gogos Alexander, Hanna Shannon, Kägi Ralf, Mansfield Elisabeth, Bustos Antonio R Montoro, Plata Desiree L, Reipa Vytas, Westerhoff Paul, Winchester Michael R
Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology , Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.
Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology , Überlandstrasse 133, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 May 3;50(9):4587-605. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05647. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have numerous exciting potential applications and some that have reached commercialization. As such, quantitative measurements of CNTs in key environmental matrices (water, soil, sediment, and biological tissues) are needed to address concerns about their potential environmental and human health risks and to inform application development. However, standard methods for CNT quantification are not yet available. We systematically and critically review each component of the current methods for CNT quantification including CNT extraction approaches, potential biases, limits of detection, and potential for standardization. This review reveals that many of the techniques with the lowest detection limits require uncommon equipment or expertise, and thus, they are not frequently accessible. Additionally, changes to the CNTs (e.g., agglomeration) after environmental release and matrix effects can cause biases for many of the techniques, and biasing factors vary among the techniques. Five case studies are provided to illustrate how to use this information to inform responses to real-world scenarios such as monitoring potential CNT discharge into a river or ecotoxicity testing by a testing laboratory. Overall, substantial progress has been made in improving CNT quantification during the past ten years, but additional work is needed for standardization, development of extraction techniques from complex matrices, and multimethod comparisons of standard samples to reveal the comparability of techniques.
碳纳米管(CNTs)具有众多令人兴奋的潜在应用,其中一些已实现商业化。因此,需要对关键环境基质(水、土壤、沉积物和生物组织)中的碳纳米管进行定量测量,以解决对其潜在环境和人类健康风险的担忧,并为应用开发提供信息。然而,目前尚无用于碳纳米管定量的标准方法。我们系统且批判性地回顾了当前碳纳米管定量方法的每个组成部分,包括碳纳米管提取方法、潜在偏差、检测限以及标准化潜力。这篇综述表明,许多检测限最低的技术需要不常见的设备或专业知识,因此它们并不常用。此外,环境释放后碳纳米管的变化(例如团聚)和基质效应会导致许多技术产生偏差,且偏差因素在不同技术之间有所不同。提供了五个案例研究,以说明如何利用这些信息来应对实际场景,例如监测碳纳米管向河流的潜在排放或测试实验室进行的生态毒性测试。总体而言,在过去十年中,碳纳米管定量方面已取得了显著进展,但在标准化、从复杂基质中开发提取技术以及对标准样品进行多方法比较以揭示技术的可比性方面,仍需要进一步开展工作。