Manolis A S, Uricchio F, Estes N A
Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Am J Cardiol. 1989 May 1;63(15):1052-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90077-5.
Amiodarone was used in 86 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) (67 patients) or ventricular fibrillation (19 patients) secondary to coronary artery disease. The mean +/- standard deviation left ventricular ejection fraction was 30 +/- 12% (range 8 to 65%). Prior trials with 4 +/- 1.2 alternate antiarrhythmic agents had been unsuccessful. Amiodarone was loaded at dosages of 1,200 to 1,800 mg/day, with maintenance dosages of 400 to 600 mg/day. Drug efficacy was evaluated by programmed stimulation at 10 to 14 days in 68 patients. In 38 patients sustained VT or ventricular fibrillation was inducible (group I), whereas 30 patients (group II) had either no inducible VT (8) or had nonsustained VT induced (22). Holter monitoring was used to assess drug efficacy in 18 patients (group III). All patients were evaluated at 3- to 6-month intervals with Holter monitors for efficacy and a standard protocol for toxicity. During a long-term follow-up of 18 +/- 16 months, sudden death occurred in 5 patients and nonfatal arrhythmia recurrences were detected in 16. The actuarial probability of freedom from fatal and nonfatal arrhythmia recurrences at 24 months was 0.52 for group I, 0.97 for group II and 0.68 for group III. The mode of induction, rate change or hemodynamic tolerance of the induced ventricular tachycardia did not predict arrhythmia recurrence. Among the clinical variables analyzed, only an ejection fraction of less than or equal to 30% was identified as a significant predictor of arrhythmia recurrence. Nonsudden cardiac death occurred in 21 patients, including 19 from heart failure and 2 from myocardial infarction. Noncardiac death occurred in 7 patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
86例继发于冠状动脉疾病的室性心动过速(VT)(67例)或室颤(19例)患者使用了胺碘酮。左心室射血分数的平均值±标准差为30±12%(范围8%至65%)。先前使用4±1.2种替代抗心律失常药物的试验均未成功。胺碘酮的负荷剂量为1200至1800mg/天,维持剂量为400至600mg/天。68例患者在10至14天时通过程序刺激评估药物疗效。38例患者可诱发出持续性VT或室颤(I组),而30例患者(II组)要么不能诱发出VT(8例),要么诱发出非持续性VT(22例)。18例患者(III组)使用动态心电图监测评估药物疗效。所有患者每隔3至6个月使用动态心电图监测评估疗效,并按照标准方案评估毒性。在18±16个月的长期随访中,5例患者发生猝死,16例检测到非致命性心律失常复发。I组、II组和III组在24个月时无致命性和非致命性心律失常复发的精算概率分别为0.52、0.97和0.68。诱发性室性心动过速的诱发方式、心率变化或血流动力学耐受性不能预测心律失常复发。在分析的临床变量中,只有射血分数小于或等于30%被确定为心律失常复发的显著预测因素。21例患者发生非心源性猝死,包括19例死于心力衰竭和2例死于心肌梗死。7例患者发生非心脏性死亡。(摘要截断于250字)