• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众舆论在塑造农业生物技术轨迹中的作用。

The Role of Public Opinion in Shaping Trajectories of Agricultural Biotechnology.

机构信息

European Twchnology Platform 'Plants for the Future' Brussels, Belgium.

Tin Duck Consulting Chesterfield, St Louis County, MO, USA.

出版信息

Trends Biotechnol. 2016 Jul;34(7):530-534. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.005
PMID:27059762
Abstract

Science and technology are not autonomous entities and research trajectories are largely influenced by public opinion. The role of political decisions becomes especially evident in light of rapidly developing new breeding techniques (NBTs) and other genome editing methods for crop improvement. Decisions on how those new techniques should be regulated may not be based entirely on scientific rationale, and even if it is decided that crops produced by NBTs do not fall under the umbrella of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), their commercialization is by no means certain at this time. If and when adopted regulations do not comply with the public's perception of risks, policy makers will find themselves under pressure to ban or restrict the use of the respective products.

摘要

科学技术不是自主的实体,研究轨迹在很大程度上受到公众意见的影响。鉴于快速发展的新型育种技术(NBT)和其他用于作物改良的基因组编辑方法,政治决策的作用尤为明显。关于这些新技术应该如何监管的决定可能不完全基于科学依据,即使决定通过 NBT 生产的作物不属于转基因生物(GMO)的范畴,它们的商业化在现阶段也并非确定无疑。如果和当采用的法规不符合公众对风险的认知,政策制定者将面临压力,不得不禁止或限制相关产品的使用。

相似文献

1
The Role of Public Opinion in Shaping Trajectories of Agricultural Biotechnology.公众舆论在塑造农业生物技术轨迹中的作用。
Trends Biotechnol. 2016 Jul;34(7):530-534. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
2
New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.旧规换新章:为欧盟作物生物技术确定新未来。
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):13-34. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2017.1289305.
3
Trials, tribulations and diversification.考验、磨难与多元化。
Nat Biotechnol. 2003 Dec;21(12):1411. doi: 10.1038/nbt1203-1411a.
4
Transgenic proteins in agricultural biotechnology: The toxicology forum 40th annual summer meeting.农业生物技术中的转基因蛋白:毒理学论坛第40届年度夏季会议
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Dec;73(3):811-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.10.014. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
5
[Why GMOs].[为何是转基因生物]
J Soc Biol. 2009;203(4):319-21. doi: 10.1051/jbio/2009036. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
6
Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing.迈向社会对基因组编辑植物育种的接受。
Trends Plant Sci. 2015 Mar;20(3):145-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
7
Towards Food Security: Current State and Future Prospects of Agrobiotechnology.迈向粮食安全:农业生物技术的现状和未来展望。
Trends Biotechnol. 2018 Dec;36(12):1219-1229. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
Policy Considerations Regarding Genome Editing.关于基因组编辑的政策考虑。
Trends Biotechnol. 2019 Oct;37(10):1029-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
9
RNAi technologies in agricultural biotechnology: The Toxicology Forum 40th Annual Summer Meeting.农业生物技术中的RNA干扰技术:毒理学论坛第40届年度夏季会议
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Nov;73(2):671-80. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
10
Europe sees sharp decline in GMO research.欧洲转基因研究急剧下降。
Nat Biotechnol. 2003 May;21(5):468-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt0503-468.

引用本文的文献

1
"You're opening Pandora's Box": Public attitudes on AI and robotics in Australian agriculture.“你正在打开潘多拉魔盒”:澳大利亚农业领域公众对人工智能和机器人技术的态度
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 15;20(9):e0332461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332461. eCollection 2025.
2
How French culture influences the framing of genetic modifications on the internet: Insights from Google-based corpus analysis.法国文化如何影响互联网上对基因改造的表述:基于谷歌语料库分析的见解
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 23;19(12):e0311934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311934. eCollection 2024.
3
University student perspectives on antimicrobial peptide use in farm animals.
大学生对家畜使用抗菌肽的看法。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0309986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309986. eCollection 2024.
4
Beekeepers Support the Use of RNA Interference (RNAi) to Control .养蜂人支持使用RNA干扰(RNAi)进行防治。
Insects. 2024 Jul 18;15(7):539. doi: 10.3390/insects15070539.
5
Regulatory frameworks can facilitate or hinder the potential for genome editing to contribute to sustainable agricultural development.监管框架可以促进或阻碍基因组编辑为可持续农业发展做出贡献的潜力。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 30;10:959236. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.959236. eCollection 2022.
6
Genetic Approaches to Enhance Multiple Stress Tolerance in Maize.利用遗传方法提高玉米的多种胁迫耐受性。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Nov 4;12(11):1760. doi: 10.3390/genes12111760.
7
Role of information in consumers' preferences for eco-sustainable genetic improvements in plant breeding.信息在消费者对植物育种中生态可持续性遗传改良偏好中的作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 29;16(7):e0255130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255130. eCollection 2021.
8
GM trust shaped by trust determinants with the impact of risk/benefit framework: the contingent role of food technology neophobia.受风险/收益框架影响的信任决定因素塑造的 GM 信任:食品技术恐惧新异性的权变作用。
GM Crops Food. 2021 Jan 2;12(1):170-191. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2020.1848230.
9
Analyzing Twitter Conversation on Genome-Edited Foods and Their Labeling in Japan.分析日本关于基因编辑食品及其标签的推特对话。
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Oct 22;11:535764. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.535764. eCollection 2020.
10
Biotechnological Approaches: Gene Overexpression, Gene Silencing, and Genome Editing to Control Fungal and Oomycete Diseases in Grapevine.生物技术方法:基因过表达、基因沉默和基因组编辑控制葡萄藤上的真菌和卵菌病害。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 9;21(16):5701. doi: 10.3390/ijms21165701.