Salzberg C Andrew, Ashikari Andrew Y, Berry Colleen, Hunsicker Lisa M
New York, N.Y.; and Littleton, Colo.
From the Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health Systems; the Ashikari Breast Center; and Revalla Plastic Surgery & Medical Aesthetics.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Aug;138(2):329-337. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002331.
Use of acellular dermal matrix for implant-based breast reconstruction appears to be associated with a lower incidence of capsular contracture compared with standard reconstruction. The majority of acellular dermal matrix studies were, however, of short duration; thus, long-term incidence of capsular contracture with acellular dermal matrix use is unknown.
Patients undergoing acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction from December of 2001 to May of 2014 at two institutions were evaluated. Cumulative incidence of capsular contracture was determined by the performing surgeon. A retrospective chart review was performed on prospectively gathered data on patient-, breast-, surgery-, and implant-related characteristics that were analyzed as potential risk factors for the development of capsular contracture.
A total of 1584 breast reconstructions in 863 patients were performed. Mean follow-up of patients was 4.7 years; 45 percent of patients had greater than or equal to 5 years of follow-up. The cumulative incidence of capsular contracture was 0.8 percent. Smaller implant size (<400 ml) and postoperative radiotherapy were significantly associated with an increased risk of capsular contracture, but the incidence of capsular contracture was 1.9 percent in irradiated breasts. All capsular contractures developed within the first 2 years, with no new events with longer follow-up.
In this long-term study, the cumulative incidence of capsular contracture with acellular dermal matrix-assisted reconstruction remains low, even in irradiated breasts. Capsular contracture appears to be an early event, and longer follow-up does not appear to increase the incidence, suggesting that acellular dermal matrix may truly mitigate the development of capsular contracture as opposed to delaying its occurrence.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
与标准乳房重建相比,使用脱细胞真皮基质进行植入式乳房重建似乎与包膜挛缩发生率较低相关。然而,大多数脱细胞真皮基质研究的持续时间较短;因此,使用脱细胞真皮基质后包膜挛缩的长期发生率尚不清楚。
对2001年12月至2014年5月在两家机构接受脱细胞真皮基质辅助乳房重建的患者进行评估。包膜挛缩的累积发生率由主刀医生确定。对前瞻性收集的关于患者、乳房、手术和植入物相关特征的数据进行回顾性图表审查,这些特征被分析为包膜挛缩发生的潜在风险因素。
共对863例患者进行了1584次乳房重建。患者的平均随访时间为4.7年;45%的患者随访时间大于或等于5年。包膜挛缩的累积发生率为0.8%。较小的植入物尺寸(<400 ml)和术后放疗与包膜挛缩风险增加显著相关,但放疗乳房中包膜挛缩的发生率为1.9%。所有包膜挛缩均在最初2年内发生,随访时间延长无新发病例。
在这项长期研究中,即使在放疗乳房中,脱细胞真皮基质辅助重建的包膜挛缩累积发生率仍然较低。包膜挛缩似乎是一个早期事件,随访时间延长似乎不会增加发生率,这表明脱细胞真皮基质可能真正减轻包膜挛缩的发生,而不是延迟其发生。
临床问题/证据水平:治疗性,IV级。