Suppr超能文献

阿司匹林用于成年人一级预防的出血风险:美国预防服务工作组的系统评价。

Bleeding Risks With Aspirin Use for Primary Prevention in Adults: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jun 21;164(12):826-35. doi: 10.7326/M15-2112. Epub 2016 Apr 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The balance between potential aspirin-related risks and benefits is critical in primary prevention.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk for serious bleeding with regular aspirin use in cardiovascular disease (CVD) primary prevention.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2010 through 6 January 2015), and relevant references from other reviews.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized, controlled trials; cohort studies; and meta-analyses comparing aspirin with placebo or no treatment to prevent CVD or cancer in adults.

DATA EXTRACTION

One investigator abstracted data, another checked for accuracy, and 2 assessed study quality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In CVD primary prevention studies, very-low-dose aspirin use (≤100 mg daily or every other day) increased major gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding risk by 58% (odds ratio [OR], 1.58 [95% CI, 1.29 to 1.95]) and hemorrhagic stroke risk by 27% (OR, 1.27 [CI, 0.96 to 1.68]). Projected excess bleeding events with aspirin depend on baseline assumptions. Estimated excess major bleeding events were 1.39 (CI, 0.70 to 2.28) for GI bleeding and 0.32 (CI, -0.05 to 0.82) for hemorrhagic stroke per 1000 person-years of aspirin exposure using baseline bleeding rates from a community-based observational sample. Such events could be greater among older persons, men, and those with CVD risk factors that also increase bleeding risk.

LIMITATIONS

Power to detect effects on hemorrhagic stroke was limited. Harms other than serious bleeding were not examined.

CONCLUSION

Consideration of the safety of primary prevention with aspirin requires an individualized assessment of aspirin's effects on bleeding risks and expected benefits because absolute bleeding risk may vary considerably by patient.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

摘要

背景

在初级预防中,潜在的阿司匹林相关风险与获益之间的平衡至关重要。

目的

评估在心血管疾病(CVD)一级预防中常规使用阿司匹林治疗时发生严重出血的风险。

数据来源

PubMed、MEDLINE、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(2010 年至 2015 年 1 月 6 日),以及其他综述的相关参考文献。

研究选择

随机对照试验;队列研究;以及比较阿司匹林与安慰剂或不治疗用于预防成人 CVD 或癌症的荟萃分析。

数据提取

一名调查员提取数据,另一名调查员检查准确性,还有 2 名调查员评估研究质量。

数据综合

在 CVD 一级预防研究中,极低剂量阿司匹林(≤100mg/d 或隔日 1 次)使主要胃肠道(GI)出血风险增加 58%(比值比[OR],1.58[95%可信区间,1.29 至 1.95]),使出血性卒中风险增加 27%(OR,1.27[CI,0.96 至 1.68])。阿司匹林相关的预计额外出血事件取决于基线假设。使用基于社区的观察性样本的出血率计算,估计每 1000 人年阿司匹林暴露的 GI 出血额外主要出血事件为 1.39(CI,0.70 至 2.28),出血性卒中为 0.32(CI,-0.05 至 0.82)。这些事件在年龄较大、男性和伴有增加出血风险的 CVD 危险因素的人群中可能更为常见。

局限性

检测出血性卒中等事件的效力有限。没有检查除严重出血以外的其他危害。

结论

考虑到阿司匹林一级预防的安全性,需要个体化评估阿司匹林对出血风险和预期获益的影响,因为绝对出血风险可能因患者而异而有较大差异。

主要资金来源

美国卫生保健研究与质量局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验